Viewing profile — rogerbraun
rogerbraun
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 27, 2011, 2:59 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 692
- Public activity
- 125 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rogerbraun
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18459721
The install docs are on the wiki: https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/wikis/Installing%...
-
comment
Comment #17408829
Some background information on ActivityPub in Pleroma: https://blog.soykaf.com/post/activity-pub-in-pleroma/ https://blog.soykaf.com/post/what-is-pleroma/
- story
-
comment
Comment #16225216
no, we really don't. Not every tool needs to be equipped for private discussions. ActivityPub and OStatus are used for Twitter-style communication. Those aren't high security commu…
-
comment
Comment #16224889
it's really not worth it. If people want to exchange encrypted messages, they should use a proper tool for that.
-
comment
Comment #16224589
In AP, messages are signed with http signatures ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cavage-http-signatures-09 ). OStatus has a similar mechanism called salmons, which are signed XM…
-
comment
Comment #16224167
there's #social on freenode, although it's not very active. You might have more luck asking your questions on #pleroma on freenode (another Ostatus/AP server) or on the mastodon di…
-
comment
Comment #16224098
messages are signed using http signatures ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cavage-http-signatures-09 )
-
comment
Comment #16223717
In OStatus 'salmons' are messages sent from one server to another that contain posts. They are signed, so the receiving server knows if it can trust it. If person peter@example.com…
-
comment
Comment #16223667
this doesn't make much sense. The very easy way to add AP-level privacy to ostatus was to just use a different salmon endpoint for private messages. This way, messages would never …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #16223567
Yes, and this was known to the main developer. There were easy ways to make it at least private if the other server was trusted, but they chose to not implement them.
-
comment
Comment #16223393
Privacy on the level of AP would have been very easy to add, by just using a different salmon endpoint for private messages. This was discussed at length back then, but Mastodon st…
-
comment
Comment #15516284
sadly, the federated timeline is close to useless. I don't understand why it isn't the public timeline that's exposed.
-
comment
Comment #15516145
This is something that was always a problem on Mastodon, but you can use other fediverse servers like https://social.sakamoto.gq/main/all to look at the network, they show things p…
-
comment
Comment #14476107
If you are European you're probably part of the visa waiver program anyway.
-
comment
Comment #12700902
I looked into this a while ago. Here are some notes I made: - https://git.heldscal.la/roger/the_wired/wiki/OStatus - https://git.heldscal.la/roger/the_wired/wiki/Salmon Hope it hel…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #12071894
It depends on your use case. The overhead is much smaller than you probably think and the Erlang / Elixir programming model works extremely well for some cases, networking for exam…
-
comment
Comment #10533451
How do you take photos that look like the old ones? They seem to have much more interesting colors.
-
comment
Comment #10505190
That's what I meant, sorry for the confusion.
-
comment
Comment #10500399
Thanks for the answer, but if you don't care about this use case, then I think I'll just use a different application that does. The things I don't like about Signal / Textsecure ar…
-
comment
Comment #10500265
Just use Conversations. It can now use the same protocol and is the best XMPP client there is. I'm completely baffled that the Textsecure people insist on using the gapps package, …
- story