Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rocha

rocha

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 12, 2008, 7:16 PM UTC
HN karma
177
Public activity
86 items

About rocha

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46686602

    But isn't this inefficient since the agent has to "bootstrap" its knowledge of the new language every time it's context window is reset?

  2. comment
    Comment #45309061

    The number of people at that compensation level is very very small, and they will probably go for a O1 type visa instead of a H1B.

  3. comment
    Comment #43754644

    Yes, but you will get an error since string and templates are different types and have different interfaces.

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #36351152

    Great resource! Thanks for bringing it up.

  6. comment
    Comment #31930061

    For some of the card games I am familiar with (Netrunner, MTG) there are resources online (wikis, dbs, deck builders) that have all the graphic assets. Alternatively, you can scan …

  7. comment
    Comment #31927270

    I think it is very doable for card games with thousands of different cards like MTG. I remember there was an old school SIFT/SURF image retrieval system that was able to deal with …

  8. comment
    Comment #31923600

    Another option is an image recognition system trained on already existing cards. No need for special ink or qr code, just a camera as the reader.

  9. comment
    Comment #28218308

    The walk really slowly. The can "run", but only for a very limited amount of time before their servos overheat and the dog has to take a nap.

  10. comment
    Comment #27925971

    Here are the arguments that the WHO used in 2015 to change the practices for naming new infectious diseases: https://www.who.int/news/item/08-05-2015-who-issues-best-pra...

  11. comment
    Comment #25034738

    This is a nice thread on the subject: https://twitter.com/nataliexdean/status/1310613702476017666?...

  12. comment
    Comment #24794462

    Nassim Taleb wrote a whole book (Skin in the Game) under a similar premise: “Never trust anyone who doesn’t have skin in the game. Without it, fools and crooks will benefit, and th…

  13. comment
    Comment #24717754

    I find https://adguard.com/ very handy for those cases.

  14. comment
    Comment #24650071

    One thousand in a million is the same as one in a thousand.

  15. comment
    Comment #24219209

    I agree completely. It is very easy to dismiss the problem if you are young and you only look at your individual risk. But if you look at society as a whole, the problem is signifi…

  16. comment
    Comment #24217945

    You said there was no data available, and I provided a reference. The data you cite has a large age group as well (0-69), which has the same problem you describe. See the comment b…

  17. comment
    Comment #24217852

    You are correct. Thanks for pointing it out. Your reference is very good. It is still a pre-print, but the breakdown is very informative. It estimates the IFR (Table 4) for ages be…

  18. comment
    Comment #24217286

    > Also congratulations for not caring about a 1 in 200 chance of death. >> Where's the data to back up any close to an assertion like this? Latest IFR estimates are between 0.5% an…

  19. comment
    Comment #23870989

    Take a look at how mRNA vaccines work, and how they came to be. It is still mind-blowing to me.

  20. comment
    Comment #23847843

    Right, good point. It is a quality of uniqueness for searchability and marketability. On top of my head I can only think of a couple of counterexamples: Windows and Messenger, but …

  21. comment
    Comment #23845565

    I was trying to address the point of the parent comment, that using common words is detrimental to searchability. I think that is true, but as shown by the examples I gave, it is n…

  22. comment
    Comment #23844824

    It is not great, but it is also not a disaster. See Go, React, Rust, Processing, Atom, Windows, etc...

  23. comment
    Comment #23761441

    I find useful to transform percentages to population scales. In your case, 99.4% recovery rate equals a 0.6% fatality rate. That translates to 1 fatality for every 166 people infec…

  24. comment
    Comment #23673588

    So about 1 person for every 400 infected. It also implies we are about 1/8 of the way from the maximum number of posible fatalities in the US.

  25. comment
    Comment #23531314

    Have you tried the Simplify GMail browser extension? It made the transition from Inbox to GMail less painful to me. https://simpl.fyi/