Viewing profile — robinh
robinh
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 21, 2012, 9:24 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 475
- Public activity
- 127 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About robinh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #7749488
Sadly not: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcoma
-
comment
Comment #7728964
The color red is often associated with bad; needs to stop; wrong. Removal isn't such a big step from there, I think. The opposite probably applies to green.
-
comment
Comment #7728916
Best of luck to you today, too.
-
comment
Comment #7728869
Ha, fairy nuff. It's what prompts one to have such a day that matters, methinks. ;)
-
comment
Comment #7728866
I'm pretty sure that's not even remotely related.
-
comment
Comment #7728865
Thank you. :)
-
comment
Comment #7728551
I suppose it's an OK sentiment, but I'm not in contact with my parents and on days like these I keep getting reminded of that fact. I was secretly hoping there wouldn't be anything…
-
comment
Comment #7672206
I agree that concurrency isn't fundamentally hard, but the reason everyone kind of prefers faster serial execution is because a lot of algorithms (extremely simple example: f^10000…
-
comment
Comment #7667514
Okay, but that's not actually an answer to my question. My question basically comes down to this: > Yes, that is intellectually dishonest, which is a huge problem. Scientists have …
-
comment
Comment #7667355
So... I know next to nothing about parapsychology itself, but have seen a lot of the drama around it, and I just have to ask: is it not intellectually dishonest to call something t…
-
comment
Comment #7656990
I think you accidentally commented in the wrong thread. Gave me a hearty chuckle in this context, though.
-
comment
Comment #7656975
Good god, if only mathematics professors would learn this. If I hear the word 'trivial' one more time I swear I'm going to scream.
-
comment
Comment #7445923
Except if you post a comment in a dead thread, your account is practically banned from participating again.
-
comment
Comment #7445896
I'm not yet sure how to feel about this, but I have one question that remains unanswered: Will this apply to submissions (possibly in the future) as well?
- story
-
comment
Comment #7365587
I have two questions. 1. I'm unfamiliar with the term 'unpacking'. Is it any different from pattern matching in, say, Haskell (but perhaps not as feature-rich)? 2. Aren't slices pr…
-
comment
Comment #7363048
Even in those extreme cases (which I hope we all agree are the exception rather than the norm), I would still consider putting someone in a few-square-meter box "cruel and unusual …
-
comment
Comment #7360108
RWH is a good recommendation, although it contains a rather large number of errors. LYAH is very good for learning the basics, too. But, if you're already a very experienced progra…
-
comment
Comment #7360079
Yes. Although I have no experience with Racket (so correct me if I'm wrong), the Lisps are inherently multi-paradigm languages. Haskell, on the other hand, is functional programmin…
-
comment
Comment #7356981
Similar issues plague Haskell. A bunch of functions have illogical names, just because that's how they've always been used. And, there's the annoying matter of Applicative not bein…
-
comment
Comment #7305193
Forkenheit 451.
-
comment
Comment #7263010
This incoherent rant as a response to a single sentence isn't really helping your case. "All those portability claims and that there somehow good: you're just doing things for lowe…
-
comment
Comment #7196261
"it will always be a result of human effort and ultimately an expression of human intent" Like babies? (Well, most of the time.)