Viewing profile — robertjglick
robertjglick
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 15, 2023, 12:09 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 44
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About robertjglick
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #38297291
https://www.stacksocial.com/sales/microsoft-windows-11-pro https://www.stacksocial.com/sales/microsoft-windows-10-pro These are some good deals from a Microsoft Partner.
-
comment
Comment #38228368
Great to see implemented in Android Codebase.
-
comment
Comment #38226574
https://archive.is/oNfNo https://archive.is/uE4ed I won't give specific since I use my real name.
-
comment
Comment #38200099
They still be shaddy, for example being persecuted by a government for your Faith. They turn over all your Contacts and ip addresses of your contacts so now all your friends can be…
-
comment
Comment #38200012
Wow this is really nice I downloaded the app and yes you need a number to verify to signup but you can choose to not share your number to groups and you can turn off the ability to…
-
comment
Comment #38186922
Well its free for a week so what's the harm in a torrent link just only download till 2023-11-15 magnet:?xt=urn:btih:C6A5F797B392B0C4CE50C3A274E4FD5573FFE92D&dn=ChatGPT%20For%20Dum…
-
comment
Comment #38104437
Some features require paying. For example: TOTP. But if you want just for passwords it is free.
-
comment
Comment #38055293
Really simple explanation about Copyright very intriguing.
- story
-
comment
Comment #37589689
I have used both and I think they both have there benefits. Graphene is super focused on Security, there google play compatibility works well you can use all google apps with them …
-
comment
Comment #36564904
I would recommend not using this VPS provider emails bounce, They have support on telegram too but if you mention anything about wanting a refund they will block you. There phone n…
- story
-
comment
Comment #36427384
Yes according to NASA
-
comment
Comment #36427376
https://sam.gov/opp/2e0365ce1e3c4c179b50fb15573d68e4/view
-
comment
Comment #36334704
https://archive.is/pSlW7