Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — roarroar

roarroar

HN member
Joined
Wed, Sep 04, 2013, 8:26 AM UTC
HN karma
78
Public activity
69 items

About roarroar

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #6721017

    Oh, piss off. There's nothing less "open" about PNaCl over obfuscated JS.

  2. comment
    Comment #6720993

    What's this based on, exactly? It's slower and the design puts the optimiser in the TCB. PNaCl is a hack arguably with some problems with dynamic code, but short of getting the OS …

  3. comment
    Comment #6693536

    I thought I wasn't "worth your time", and yet you're still talking to me. Not very bright, are you?

  4. comment
    Comment #6692333

    You don't even understand what slave morality is. Why do you respond to things you don't understand? The fact that you think what you just wrote is in contradiction to my position …

  5. comment
    Comment #6687977

    It's okay, I don't expect chronically stupid people to recognise their betters.

  6. comment
    Comment #6687975

    Feminism is a slave morality by definition. I didn't invent the term. You're welcome to reject advances in Western Philosophy if you like. The value that comes out of engaging me i…

  7. comment
    Comment #6687959

    I don't know what you mean by "slaving morality". Is that a new term for "master morality", or a typo?

  8. comment
    Comment #6687953

    My language is not more "wildly provocative" than your use of the the phrase "wildly provocative". It's only "wildly provocative" to you because you didn't bother to understand it.…

  9. comment
    Comment #6687942

    That you think the terms "slave morality" and "total degeneration" are "extreme rhetoric" illustrates that you didn't understand the post. The point of reading is not to find any o…

  10. comment
    Comment #6687916

    In other words, you ignored the content of my comment and went looking for _dirt_ you could use against me. Bravo, you complete imbecile. And I am anti-egalitarian - feminism is ju…

  11. comment
    Comment #6687861

    Maybe the downvoters can make an argument. I doubt it, since that is the reason people abuse the downvote button - to shut off an argument they are incapable of understanding.

  12. comment
    Comment #6687835

    >Broad generalizations and extreme sexism. Your comment is up there with the "worst garbage" on HN. An inconvenient opinion that you have no answer to (see next paragraph), answere…

  13. comment
    Comment #6687818

    The first iteration of what? Total degeneration? How can you "improve" a test designed to enforce slave morality on creative people?

  14. comment
    Comment #6687651

    Maybe if feminists (part of the parasitic political class) spent less time being resentful of what others have built and built something themselves they'd have less reason to be re…

  15. comment
    Comment #6551487

    >The point of the post was about hatred and rejection of women in software engineering, and this comment was one example of it being a real thing, frequently denied all over HN. No…

  16. comment
    Comment #6551288

    Perhaps you're right. Let's chalk that up to misunderstanding, shall we?

  17. comment
    Comment #6551277

    >I'm not ignoring what he said. I am responding specifically to it. You are telling people to ignore the objectionable sections of his comment to talk about the bit you want to. Ob…

  18. comment
    Comment #6551200

    Exactly. The guy hating women or not is not _irrelevant_, but it's not relevant in the way GP is trying to use it. That's why he tries to play the "ad hominem" card so he can throw…

  19. comment
    Comment #6551158

    >I'm not attempting to "psychologize" the guy. Yes, you speculated on his mental state quite extensively. Quoting you: "He was just lashing out at something he's afraid of and frus…

  20. comment
    Comment #6551072

    Yes, and I'm sure where you come from "micro-aggressions" is a real word too. >And calling programming a "male space" is inherently exclusionary. No, it's a statement of fact. The …

  21. comment
    Comment #6551051

    Again, your whole deal is "what is he like"? This is the sort of dull thinking that leads people to become obsessed with rumors and celebrity gossip. The fact that he might hate wo…

  22. comment
    Comment #6551028

    I didn't bring up the term "ad hominem". Please stop putting words into my mouth. You are very determined to do anything but address anything anyone's actually saying. Your defense…

  23. comment
    Comment #6551017

    >What he said about women trying to make a progressive movement all about their vagina? It's an outburst. So what? Maybe it's humor, maybe he has some kind of pathological issue wi…

  24. comment
    Comment #6550972

    Sorry, misogyny means hating women. Perversion of language won't help you. Also, I don't care if the guy is a misogynist or not. There are plenty of hateful people in the world. I …

  25. comment
    Comment #6550962

    Well, since you are now no longer talking about "hostility" or even absolute inclusion (but rather the much less definite "more inclusive"), then I assume you retract your assertio…