Viewing profile — rmcginnis
rmcginnis
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jan 06, 2017, 7:25 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 962
- Public activity
- 118 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rmcginnis
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45108503
Our HN Launch was number 1 for two days straight 6 years ago, and I wanted to follow up with this huge update - We’ve done it. We now have the technology to revolutionize how energ…
- story
- job
-
comment
Comment #31268342
Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #31268323
Yes, only inputs are air and electricity. If you have an equipment payback of only a few years, then after that all fuel is close to opex only. Similar to solar itself.
-
comment
Comment #31268315
$3.00 / gallon is our v 1.0 (before taxes)
- story
- job
- job
-
comment
Comment #28638559
Thanks! Really appreciate the positive comment :)
-
comment
Comment #28638554
Thanks for the feedback. Working on the site and hope to have improvements in the next few months with improved tech explanations, clarity, and speed.
-
comment
Comment #28638538
Jet fuel energy content is approx. 37 kWh/gallon. At 40% efficiency that's 92.5 kWh. At $0.01/kWh, $92.5 cents per gallon for energy cost. Spot price for jet fuel is approx. $2.00 …
-
comment
Comment #28638516
The second important thing is to make the CAPEX really cheap. That's been the core focus for us for the last 2.5 years since demo day and we're looking at really low costs for equi…
-
comment
Comment #28636016
One cent per gallon less than the fossil jet fuel spot price - in California (we will use LCFS credits to start)
-
comment
Comment #28635982
Project Foghorn was technically successful but couldn't hit the economics. The tech lead on that project is now a scientific advisor for Prometheus - Matt Eisaman
-
comment
Comment #28635926
Sorry to all about the drop in website performance. Working on it!
-
comment
Comment #28635892
$36/ton is our cost to capture CO2 from the air. For us it is an input to making things, not a product, so we don't need to purify it to 100% pure CO2, just need to capture it into…
-
comment
Comment #28635856
Working on it!
-
comment
Comment #28635844
In order to make electrofuels cost competitive, you've got to use new utility scale solar, which is now less than $0.02/kWh : https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/04/08/saudi-arabias-s…
-
comment
Comment #28635795
If you'd like to see some of my publications (including old desalination stuff), check out my Google Scholar page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=t4ZIFUoAAAAJ&hl=en
-
comment
Comment #28635774
Hi everybody, I'm the founder of Prometheus. Happy to answer any questions!
-
comment
Comment #27851965
$36 is the cost of the capital equipment and energy needed to remove the CO2 from the air. Just an internal metric. Not tied to sale prices.
-
comment
Comment #27851948
Founder of Prometheus here - stay tuned for a relevant announcement tomorrow!
-
comment
Comment #19850068
The CO2 is absorbed in the electrolyte, and that's where we use it in the catalysis process. It is turned into fuel within the electrolyte, then we extract that fuel from it.
-
comment
Comment #19849864
Yes, we're actually agnostic on CO2 source. To get to scale we'll need to use CO2 from direct air capture, but we could by the collection from someone else.