Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rmcginnis

rmcginnis

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 06, 2017, 7:25 PM UTC
HN karma
962
Public activity
118 items

About rmcginnis

Founder and CEO of Prometheus, Mattershift. Was co-founder and CTO of Oasys Water. YC(W19)

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45108503

    Our HN Launch was number 1 for two days straight 6 years ago, and I wanted to follow up with this huge update - We’ve done it. We now have the technology to revolutionize how energ…

  2. story
  3. job
  4. comment
  5. comment
    Comment #31268323

    Yes, only inputs are air and electricity. If you have an equipment payback of only a few years, then after that all fuel is close to opex only. Similar to solar itself.

  6. comment
    Comment #31268315

    $3.00 / gallon is our v 1.0 (before taxes)

  7. story
  8. job
  9. job
  10. comment
    Comment #28638559

    Thanks! Really appreciate the positive comment :)

  11. comment
    Comment #28638554

    Thanks for the feedback. Working on the site and hope to have improvements in the next few months with improved tech explanations, clarity, and speed.

  12. comment
    Comment #28638538

    Jet fuel energy content is approx. 37 kWh/gallon. At 40% efficiency that's 92.5 kWh. At $0.01/kWh, $92.5 cents per gallon for energy cost. Spot price for jet fuel is approx. $2.00 …

  13. comment
    Comment #28638516

    The second important thing is to make the CAPEX really cheap. That's been the core focus for us for the last 2.5 years since demo day and we're looking at really low costs for equi…

  14. comment
    Comment #28636016

    One cent per gallon less than the fossil jet fuel spot price - in California (we will use LCFS credits to start)

  15. comment
    Comment #28635982

    Project Foghorn was technically successful but couldn't hit the economics. The tech lead on that project is now a scientific advisor for Prometheus - Matt Eisaman

  16. comment
    Comment #28635926

    Sorry to all about the drop in website performance. Working on it!

  17. comment
    Comment #28635892

    $36/ton is our cost to capture CO2 from the air. For us it is an input to making things, not a product, so we don't need to purify it to 100% pure CO2, just need to capture it into…

  18. comment
    Comment #28635856

    Working on it!

  19. comment
    Comment #28635844

    In order to make electrofuels cost competitive, you've got to use new utility scale solar, which is now less than $0.02/kWh : https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/04/08/saudi-arabias-s…

  20. comment
    Comment #28635795

    If you'd like to see some of my publications (including old desalination stuff), check out my Google Scholar page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=t4ZIFUoAAAAJ&hl=en

  21. comment
    Comment #28635774

    Hi everybody, I'm the founder of Prometheus. Happy to answer any questions!

  22. comment
    Comment #27851965

    $36 is the cost of the capital equipment and energy needed to remove the CO2 from the air. Just an internal metric. Not tied to sale prices.

  23. comment
    Comment #27851948

    Founder of Prometheus here - stay tuned for a relevant announcement tomorrow!

  24. comment
    Comment #19850068

    The CO2 is absorbed in the electrolyte, and that's where we use it in the catalysis process. It is turned into fuel within the electrolyte, then we extract that fuel from it.

  25. comment
    Comment #19849864

    Yes, we're actually agnostic on CO2 source. To get to scale we'll need to use CO2 from direct air capture, but we could by the collection from someone else.