Viewing profile — rm-rf
rm-rf
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 29, 2009, 11:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 362
- Public activity
- 114 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rm-rf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #3265320
The whois for the domain is accurate.
-
comment
Comment #2697111
And just for kicks, they accidentally open up your files to anyone who knows your e-mail address.
-
comment
Comment #2697105
And - To (hopefully) install a shim that lets them install software that lets their help desk help their customer more effectively. If I were trying to support millions of 'ordinar…
-
comment
Comment #2687604
Or - as I picked up from some long forgotten blog post: If you need Oracle, you'll know it. If you don't know that you need Oracle, you don't need Oracle. I run MySQL, Oracle SQL S…
-
comment
Comment #2665841
Presumably they have. But given the number of times Safari has been remotely exploitable in the past, that's not necessarily reassuring.
-
comment
Comment #2665820
How is this different than Adobe Reader, where the ability to execute code within a document reading application has resulted in world wide exploits of operating systems? If my doc…
-
comment
Comment #2665522
So my ebooks can now contain executable root kits. Cool.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #2587233
Agreed - I certainly don't see anything that I'd call 'innovation', and there is nothing on any open source desktop that would send me off to my friends and relatives houses to swi…
-
comment
Comment #2456633
How does a retailer using Square manage PCI compliance? Are retailers using Square automatically non-compliant? My understanding is that PCI Council has not approved mobile applica…
-
comment
Comment #2319597
"* Change the SSH port" "Why are you doing this? What will you achieve by it?" Changing the port does not improve security. It does, however: - dramatically reduce the noise associ…
-
comment
Comment #2247241
"Are they also counting the extra downtime" With Windows 7, there should be no more (or less) downtime than any other operating system. "anti-malware packages and so on?" Anti-viru…
-
comment
Comment #2245856
"Mainly because the enterprise is guaranteed to buy at least a few hundred copies." Or a few thousand, or a few hundred thousand.
-
comment
Comment #2245370
One factor likely at play here is the low cost of licensing MS products under the enterprise/volume licensing agreements. Where I'm at it's costing well under $100/person/year to l…
- story
-
comment
Comment #2210434
I've seen single line changes cause data loss, corruption, system outages, remote root exploits... I'm not sure that the number of lines makes the change more or less risky.
-
comment
Comment #2169980
I wouldn't. Replication yes. A logical backup? no.
-
comment
Comment #2052172
Good paper. I've been using hybrid hardware/software load balancers since 2004, and over time I came to different conclusions than the author on load balancing algorithms, SSL offl…
-
comment
Comment #2038026
Because of it's market share? Perhaps.
-
comment
Comment #2038024
I haven't seen any evidence of that. Do you have some data that you can share? One thing that I have noticed is that Mozilla tends to push Firefox fixes out as soon as they are rea…
-
comment
Comment #2037712
And install all it's vulnerabilities on your Mac?
-
comment
Comment #2037704
And then Firefox will announce a zero-day. What will you have gained?
-
comment
Comment #2037698
The more interesting question: Is IE8 significantly worse than the alternatives? I think not. All major browsers on all common operating systems have exploitable vulnerabilities of…
-
comment
Comment #2026868
A globally routable v6 network isn't too hard to do at home with tunnelbroker.net and similar services. A Dlink DIR-825 has enough v6 support to hold up it's end of the tunnel and …
-
comment
Comment #2026851
And with that kind of money, they can finally afford to implement secure software development, code review, fuzzing, & vulnerability testing. We'll all be better off when they do.