Viewing profile — rikatee

it's a good start. VSCode is most popular. Largest impact. More potential users. More likely to find a customer base.

> internally and see a 5-10x boost on some tasks. That's my experience with co-pilots too: - Generating tests - Generating functions consistent with prevailing style of similar fun…

I like this. I think AI agents are the future of software development. AI will not replace devs. Devs that use AI will replace devs that do not use AI. The most effective devs will…

FWIW, HN is much more positive (while also raising valid points that will be taken into account going forward)

flake8 does not currently support this check, as they are concerned about the false positives from "what if the string it later used in .format(...)" However, Code Review Doctor is…

what's also ironic is I left an easter egg in the code sample for how we downloaded the list of repositories and no one has noticed it yet.

klyrs was right about the reply from me (a dev behdind Code Review Doctor) being dismissive in the issue. I apologise for that. FWIW my reaction was classic "expectations not meeti…

Yeah good point that sucks. I will move off wordpress because I'm not a fan of tracking cookies. It's got ridiculous.

interestingly 69 of the 666 repos had the f string issues

of the codebases checked yep (20 of 666 checked). Bear in mind only 28% of codebases actually use built-in unittest package that this gotcha is affected by, so really it's 20 of 28…

Agreed in perfect world, but unfortunately any process that involves humans will involve human error. We do code review because we expect human error when the code was written by a…

we were all waiting for you to

yes that's exactly the kind of problem :)

it does not, it just prints them out in the console

the post covers the built-in unittest package, which 28% of devs still use. But pytest is nicer to work with. I think brownfield codebases and inertia are the reason 28% of devs wo…

you're right thanks! Updated :)

deep ninja turtles lore