Viewing profile — righttoolforjob
righttoolforjob
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 06, 2021, 4:50 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 104
- Public activity
- 113 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About righttoolforjob
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43148474
If we assume the hypothesis that the current officials are russian plants, then since F.B.I already is being taken over and diverting resources away from foreign threats then this …
-
comment
Comment #41294091
Scrum is moronic and has proven itself worse and worse over the past 20 years. It started out with good intent but today it is either merely not-in-the-way or horribly dysfunctiona…
-
comment
Comment #37510754
Perhaps? But unless I'd report directly to Elon, I might not want to work in his organizations. Amazon is clearly a whack place for many and there is no shortage of horrible storie…
-
comment
Comment #37499944
simple: there is no such set.
-
comment
Comment #36175255
I think you meant "separate".
-
comment
Comment #36175235
What do you mean? That's the entire point of talking about things.
-
comment
Comment #36089178
Well, take a car as an example. The question is not what you use a car for, but rather how the car is built.
-
comment
Comment #35904914
I've used it for about 25 years and still love it. Wish you would port it to Windows as well!
-
comment
Comment #35379427
They're likely irrelevant anyway. We're all shouting into the void.
-
comment
Comment #35379400
This is nothing like a nuclear bomb. A nuclear bomb doesn't choose to explode itself, nor can it replicate itself.
-
comment
Comment #35379392
That's besides the point. The argument still holds. We don't want to find ourselves with our foot on an exploding mine before we stop walking across the minefield. At that point it…
-
comment
Comment #35379331
What is the limit of intelligence? What limits the human intelligence? How many more times intelligent would an AGI have to be to have the capacity to take over the world?
-
comment
Comment #35379288
Nobody says that it necessarily follows, but it's a quite trivial step once you have the AGI, hence pointless that you bring up it as an argument.
-
comment
Comment #35379244
Who said it followed? That's a strawman. To dumb it down even further for you, I guess... There are brains, therefore there can be created an artificial super-brain. Artificial sup…
-
comment
Comment #35379179
Nothing hand-wavy about it. The article that this thread is based on provides the evidence, and you are refuting it. I am refuting your refutation. My experience aligns exactly wit…
-
comment
Comment #35376853
What a horrible argument from this guy, whoever he is. And ending with a whataboutism just for the sake of it. I hope nobody regards him as some authority, because he is quite unin…
-
comment
Comment #35376825
I can't find a flaw in this argument. That is a bit scary actually.
-
comment
Comment #35376477
> It's not exactly built-in obsolescence, so much as being built to cost. How do you know this? Seems completely implausible. Source please.
-
comment
Comment #35376416
The regular consumer, like us, don't give a rats ass about the technology behind the light, we just want them to work well. The light is much, much worse than incandescents for the…
-
comment
Comment #35376359
Hi, also European here. Everything the article complains about is true. The light from LEDs is significantly worse, even in Europe.
-
comment
Comment #35110469
> The only thing you need here is knowledge about how the primitives work and how they compose. That's really the only challenge. > I can explain by comparing it to art. Artistry i…
-
comment
Comment #35101762
I can't argue with your points about not having evidence, but I refuse to brush it off as "merely anecdotal" as well. > I think of system design as something that is tediously hard…
-
comment
Comment #35086843
Even though there isn't a formal theory, there definitely is a big difference between a person capable of doing good system design and one who isn't. I don't think all people are c…
-
comment
Comment #35022081
You've misunderstood the quoted paragraph. They are saying that services that aren't on the corporate network behind the VPN or PEP should not require being routed through the corp…
-
comment
Comment #35014256
Except, you can combine VPNs with other tech. There is nothing exclusionary about it. It's defense-in-depth which, tada, NIST recommends.