Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — riferguson

riferguson

HN member
Joined
Fri, Aug 15, 2008, 2:24 PM UTC
HN karma
147
Public activity
19 items

About riferguson

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #1989351

    ...which won a Grammy last year for "Best Bluegrass Album", and for which he is actively touring right now. So, yeah, his point is "here are the royalty riches you can expect when …

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #1623276

    "Easy", as in least effort on your part, or "easy", as in highest probability of success? Not at all the same thing.

  4. comment
    Comment #1469884

    Judge Learned Hand: "Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not…

  5. comment
    Comment #1308539

    I stand corrected. Apple has one patent in the H.264 pool, US 7292636, and one in the MPEG-4 Systems pool, US 6134243. I have no idea if either of these would be relevant to Theora…

  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #1308422

    Presumably it would be the holders of the putatively infringed patents that would be assembling the "pool". I don't think Apple is in the Video Codec patent-holding business. As a …

  8. comment
    Comment #1268446

    Once again, Gabe and Tycho have the important insight: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19/

  9. comment
    Comment #1181330

    If the job involves writing code, you're going to be asked to write code in the interview. The "reverse-a-linked-list" question is an attempt at "minimal coding question that anyon…

  10. comment
    Comment #1181001

    Three things: First, those are questions for a variety of different positions all mixed together. Product manager candidates get asked different questions than engineering candidat…

  11. comment
    Comment #1010926

    I have absolutely no opinion about the validity of this particular patent, but I want to forestall a bunch of random griping. Please, please don't post commentary that involves "ju…

  12. comment
    Comment #702384

    Every reference to the GPL in the article is to version 3 of the license, which does not contain the language you reference. Care to try again?

  13. comment
    Comment #524561

    You're missing mine, I'm afraid: I've made no claim about anyone having to do anything. Indeed, if I was in Charlie's shoes, I wouldn't be working on spec. Let me put it another wa…

  14. comment
    Comment #524495

    I will go and read the paper. Thanks for the pointer.

  15. comment
    Comment #524481

    [Let's use "Alice" as the name of our hypothetical security researcher.] If the Bad Guys can get the exploit from someone else, then Apple equally could pay someone other than Alic…

  16. comment
    Comment #524445

    I have no problem with you, Charlie, or anyone else being paid top dollar for his or her work, particularly in an important field like security research. Indeed, I think it's a gre…

  17. comment
    Comment #524413

    Miller says that the bugs have a market value beyond $5000 -- indeed, he claims that an IE8 exploit has a "market value" of over $50k. But that market value exists only if you're w…

  18. comment
    Comment #518166

    Dude, Google is your friend. Mike was being coy when he described himself as a "former Microsoft employee", but dismissing him as a "random investor from Texas" is silly. http://pe…

  19. comment
    Comment #276993

    It's not clear from the video, but the utility power number probably includes environmental stuff like cooling and lights. Just dividing one number by the other isn't going to give…