Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rickncliff

rickncliff

HN member
Joined
Thu, Oct 24, 2019, 9:09 PM UTC
HN karma
96
Public activity
30 items

About rickncliff

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #21804623

    Newspapers don't want solutions they just want to keep reporting on problems thus help maintaining the status quo.

  3. comment
    Comment #21796700

    I'm guessing it's some sort of a rule here to have at least one anti-google link on the front page at all times but I think this needs addressing: 1. Ads keep the lights on and the…

  4. comment
    Comment #21796316

    This is ridiculous; so Amazon aren't supposed to use open source software or offer services that compete with startups?! It's suspect when papers side with accusers and adopt their…

  5. comment
    Comment #21778397

    Whatever else they do it doesn't preclude protectionism.

  6. comment
    Comment #21777587

    >ACCC to lead development of a code of conduct to govern dealings between tech giants and media businesses. Murdoch country is doing his bidding and tapping themselves on the back,…

  7. comment
    Comment #21777532

    How is FB "consumer-hostile"? You'll have to pay a lot more to watch all that Disney IP soon enough.

  8. comment
    Comment #21776445

    If it got to that and it's not some sort of WSJ attempt to advocate for this sort of thing, facebook must fight it tooth and nail, and stop these attempts at governmental micromana…

  9. comment
    Comment #21768878

    It's unfortunate that this almarmist technophobic slant is considered worthy journalism.

  10. comment
    Comment #21752935

    That is one way, don't buy his cars is another, and he can say whatever he wants.

  11. comment
    Comment #21752860

    Profiteering lawyers as middlemen to technology application is what these overly strict privacy laws are trying to establish and that's a shame.

  12. comment
    Comment #21729608

    Consequences should be social, not legal.

  13. comment
    Comment #21727224

    Avoiding speech restrictions is always a positive in my book. As for the larger picture "defamation" is incompatible with the first amendment and laws around it should be invalidat…

  14. comment
    Comment #21698146

    I don't much care about throwing the codeword "unbiased" in there, it's just pandering to critics and their nonsense talking points.

  15. comment
    Comment #21696723

    Thankfully 1A shields us from speech restricting laws.

  16. comment
    Comment #21696673

    If you want to arrange more job opportunities for humanities majors just say so.

  17. comment
    Comment #21696639

    That tends to happen when the media is flooded with negative PR against you for an extended period of time.

  18. story
  19. story
  20. story
  21. comment
    Comment #21508998

    "such backlash"? you just heard about it. And there is nothing wrong about monetary profit as motivation, the pursuit of profits has elevated the living standards of billions aroun…

  22. comment
  23. comment
    Comment #21507946

    They employ a lot of talented people and they are among the few organizations that have the resources and will to actually solve these intricate problems, so more power to them as …

  24. comment
    Comment #21507922

    Evidently "consent" isn't lawfully required. The hope is that any breakthrough might lower healthcare costs, and in the worst case scenario at least some patients might benefit whi…

  25. comment
    Comment #21507756

    Surely they could have come up with a less alarmist headline for what seems like a much needed initiative in healthcare innovation. But that's the case for all tech coverage nowada…