Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — richraposa

richraposa

HN member
Joined
Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 3:59 PM UTC
HN karma
18
Public activity
10 items

About richraposa

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #38298951

    ...says the completely anonymous internet guy. I'm laughing as much as you are. I wasn't trying to imply anything negative about DuckDB with my post - was just sharing how ClickHou…

  2. comment
    Comment #38277265

    ClickHouse just reads the values from the one column being summed: https://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2023/11/15/clickhouse-summ...

  3. comment
    Comment #38271190

    Nice. I did the same thing on ClickHouse - took 11 seconds: SELECT sum(size) FROM url('https://huggingface.co/datasets/vivym/midjourney-messages/resolve/main/data/0000{01..55}.parq…

  4. comment
    Comment #38271019

    CGW = Can't Go Wrong...love it

  5. comment
    Comment #37992193

    ClickHouse 10 years before DuckDB existed: SELECT * FROM url(' https://example.com/*.csv ')

  6. comment
    Comment #37987575

    I suppose if you had data in a format that DuckDb doesn't work with, like Protobuf, Avro, ORC, Arrow, etc. ClickHouse reads and writes data in over 70 formats

  7. comment
    Comment #35580987

    ingestion of these events during peaks at 500k events per minute. You can't ingest them individually into Clickhouse or most other databases. Turn on async_insert or use a Buffer t…

  8. comment
    Comment #35520207

    Cloudflare famously uses ClickHouse for web analytics - inserting over 6M rows per second: https://blog.cloudflare.com/http-analytics-for-6m-requests-p...

  9. comment
    Comment #35011284

    It's definitely cool to be able to query data in place instead of inserting it into a table. You can use clickhouse-local to do the same thing with JSON files (and with dozens of o…

  10. comment
    Comment #33458059

    You should try it on ClickHouse Cloud - the pricing is not based on bytes, so the resulting cost would be near zero compared to $1M on BigQuery. And it would probably execute faste…