Viewing profile — richbhanover
richbhanover
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Dec 24, 2015, 8:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 52
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About richbhanover
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42853030
> ... guaranteed minimal latencies. You could now shave off another 20-100ms of latency for your FaceTime calls... I already do this. But I cheat - I use a good router (OpenWrt One…
-
comment
Comment #34739266
The name "bufferbloat" is falling out of favor. First off, it has a horrible sound... And it doesn't really give an intuitive sense of what's wrong. Referring to "latency" or (my f…
-
comment
Comment #32802547
What do you think of PRQL ("prequel")? https://github.com/prql/prql
-
comment
Comment #32495020
> I just stopped updating the controller software (none of their gear is external-facing, and IIRC it's only needed for configuration/management) because cloud login is an absolute…
-
comment
Comment #31692232
Interestingly, a significant portion of the recent WWDC presentation talked about decreasing buffering in server-side systems. https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2022/1007…
-
comment
Comment #31013210
As another poster noted, the Feds funded a lot of the cost of electrification. There is starting to be some action on the internet front. But... Here are the economics for a fiber …
-
comment
Comment #25536943
@LinuxBender is on the right track. Bufferbloat can cause this kind of lag. (There may be other causes, but first thing to do is check for bufferbloat.) To do this use: http://dslr…
-
comment
Comment #23202754
Your router is holding ("buffering") packets in the hopes that they can be sent soon. Your measurements indicate that the router is "bloated", holding about five seconds (5,000 ms)…
-
comment
Comment #22703241
Yes. Check for bufferbloat using http://DSLReports.com/speedtest If you get a grade below "B", then your home router is likely bufferbloated. Then read "What can I do about Bufferb…
-
comment
Comment #22703217
You wrote: > Why should the video bitrate be dropped because some second rate ISPs are oversubscribing super badly? Isn't all of this totally against the principles of net neutrali…
-
comment
Comment #17565415
Yes, we need to emphasize this point. Netflix (and Youtube and Hulu and all the other big content providers) pay big bucks (millions per month) to get the content from their server…
-
comment
Comment #17565301
Latency is a measure of how long it takes a packet to go from your computer to some other computer and back. People usually measure this by a ping test Unloaded latency (when there…
-
comment
Comment #14511263
I just saw the National Weather Service offers new API info. I have no idea whether this meets your need: https://forecast-v3.weather.gov/documentation?redirect=legac...
-
comment
Comment #13784477
> In either case, neither queue builds up in the home router -- that is exactly the problem, since we can't control the queue size in the modem or ISP! But by traffic shaping to 3.…
-
comment
Comment #13782440
Yes, but... A "bottleneck" occurs wherever there is a high speed link going to a lower speed link. In your case, the 100 Mbps Ethernets in your home feed through the router to the …
-
comment
Comment #13780164
> All routers are doing the same. EU Law. Citation still needed. a) I reviewed your eur-lex.europa.eu link, and didn't find anything that prohibits installing other firmware. Pleas…
-
comment
Comment #13780095
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. The laws of physics (of the internet) dictate that the piece of equipment at a bottleneck is responsible for handling bloat/congestion on its own…
-
comment
Comment #13776663
And there's good news on the Wi-Fi front as well. Many of the same people who brought us fq_codel/cake have new algorithms for "Making Wi-Fi Fast". Their paper tells how they've re…
-
comment
Comment #13775603
Yes, but it can occur on both ends of the bottleneck. Your ISP's equipment has a bottleneck link toward your home, and can have bloated buffers on that side. But if your router doe…
-
comment
Comment #13775504
Sure, you could make yourself crazy trying to prioritize all the traffic with varying kinds of flags. Or you could just let an algorithm (SQM - fq_codel or cake) automatically dete…
-
comment
Comment #13775356
Not so - Bufferbloat can occur everywhere there's a bottleneck link. Your home router's link to the ISP is likely to be one, and most don't have any mitigation, and suffer from hig…
-
comment
Comment #13775285
Yes, Don't Congest. But you can spend your life marking various kinds of traffic (many apps already do mark it, as someone down-thread mentioned), and pray that your router (and re…
-
comment
Comment #13763418
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned bufferbloat yet. In most home routers, people can see seconds of delay when there's significant other traffic on the link. (And remember, "o…
-
comment
Comment #13481029
@pktgen Thanks for the good note. You've nailed the science behind this and the proper fix. In your note below, you also note that Ubiquiti router firmware has fq_codel/cake. I'd l…
-
comment
Comment #13298274
I use Password Wallet ( http://www.selznick.com/ ). It's not sexy, but has decent web browser integration, and it has never failed for me. (More specifically, it does a couple thin…