Viewing profile — rhaksw
rhaksw
HN member- Joined
- Fri, May 31, 2019, 3:44 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 959
- Public activity
- 342 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rhaksw
mail: robert at domain of https://www.reveddit.com/about/faq
podcast: https://youtu.be/ndiAl6QEA6k?t=1373
https://twitter.com/rhaksw
https://old.reddit.com/user/rhaksw
October, 2022 Talk: https://shadowmoderation.com/2022-10-transparent-moderation/
Recent public activity
-
story
Show HN: GhostedWatch, an extension that detects silent removals on patriots.win
Hi HN, I built Reveddit [1] a few years ago to let Reddit users know when their comments get secretly removed. I've now built GhostedWatch to do the same thing for the .win sites (…
-
comment
Comment #47532570
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #43142880
> In the tussle between regulators and companies, companies are disadvantaged. When society once again properly separates governmental powers, it will restore balance, and then com…
-
comment
Comment #42983596
> "Tempo/MacQuake Palace" Confession: I ran that. Sorry, Apple– that was wrong! If I recall correctly, I'd grab the latest version from a private Hotline site, then re-host it on m…
-
comment
Comment #40832464
> The democratic element is in the selection of an executive every 4 years. That did nothing to help the fishery in this case. The burdens placed upon them came from a lower level …
-
comment
Comment #40827868
> I think it's more analogous to the overlap between police and prosecutors. Those both fall under the executive branch. Plus, Chevron deference was about the court's actions, not …
-
comment
Comment #40827530
This decision has more to do with the Court owning its own past mistake, where they deferred to executive agencies. But both the judiciary and the legislative enabled the executive…
-
comment
Comment #40827463
He's probably referring to Administrative Law Justices (ALJs), who are part of the executive, not the judiciary.
-
comment
Comment #40827432
The executive does not interpret law in the sense understood by the separation of powers. Interpretation is a judiciary power.
-
comment
Comment #40827354
> Chevron was based on the idea that if statutory text is ambiguous the people in charge of implementing said statute were best positioned to figure out what it meant Wouldn't it b…
-
comment
Comment #40827306
It's more clear if you use the word vest and divest rather than delegation. Congress cannot divest its own legislative powers, nor can it vest them in another branch.
-
comment
Comment #40827262
Congress cannot divest its legislative power, nor can it vest interpretive power to executive-branch agencies. The judiciary interprets law— not Congress.
-
comment
Comment #39786396
I'd argue their success comes from making people think they're in an open discussion forum, or at least know when they're moderated, when in fact users get moderated left and right…
-
comment
Comment #39786331
Interesting, it has a del.icio.us scraper. I still don't understand why that site disappeared, it was great. By my recollection, Yahoo bought it and killed it.
-
comment
Comment #39786224
Tons of mod tools built on top of shadow comment removals: crowd control, comment nuke, disruptive comment collapsing, contributor quality score, subreddit shadow bans via automode…
-
comment
Comment #39266988
In the case of shadow banning, you haven't kicked them off your property. You're asking them to stay while you earn ad money from their attention. See the linked tweet for a more l…
-
comment
Comment #39261058
Thank you for the question. I can think of two reasons: (1) You wouldn't want someone to secretly remove or demote your own commentary. But secretive content moderation is extremel…
-
comment
Comment #39237348
Your comment isn't dismissive, but I do think users have a right to know where they've been moderated.
-
comment
Comment #39235451
Full moderation logs are different than showing submitters how their posts have been moderated. On HN, my understanding is that you (moderators) can penalize stories without the su…
-
comment
Comment #39234512
I would prefer if the market decides, but there are a few non-trivial court cases coming up that may influence what happens. [1] https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/htm…
-
comment
Comment #39233422
I support transparent-to-the-author content moderation, and I suspect that is in the future for today's major platforms, whether they want it or not.
-
comment
Comment #39232887
> Wtf are you talking about? He’s literally telling us and has mentioned in the community many times that flagging quickly crushes a story. It's discussed in the link, and elsewher…
-
comment
Comment #39232851
> alter the score on a story It's cool that you set up your own instance, but do you see no problem with covertly altering the score of a story? Such secrecy leads to oversized, ov…
-
comment
Comment #39232791
Communities would get a good sense for the frequency if forums would simply disclose content moderation to the submitting users. Offending users would learn what's not allowed and …
-
comment
Comment #39232515
> Robin89, can you please fix the text? know that was just a mistaken good-faith assumption but it's super wrong. How can he/we verify it's wrong? The down-weighting you describe i…