Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rhacker

rhacker

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jan 28, 2018, 5:40 PM UTC
HN karma
3,943
Public activity
1,711 items

About rhacker

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #36236547

    Lol for once smoke in the news that I'm not (yet) breathing. (FarNorCal)

  2. comment
    Comment #36139489

    So like, would that not suggest that Google has a moat with AI, as it is already intertwined with our email, calendars, etc... (if they ever make their AI public)

  3. comment
    Comment #36138788

    Guess there really is a moat.

  4. comment
    Comment #36039689

    What about people falling into phase 1 homelessness: RVs

  5. comment
    Comment #36032112

    Pretty much. We can't get past the big wigs until the big wigs are no longer enforcing beliefs that make little sense.

  6. comment
    Comment #35975629

    Models are worthless without reproducible training anyway. What good is a point in time model if you can't update it going forward.

  7. comment
    Comment #35975562

    Same here but I'm also a programmer, YYYY-MM-DD

  8. comment
    Comment #35947060

    If everyone that read your comment decided to donate, it might.

  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #35894123

    What happens when you add that much weight to a flat roof and then the snow comes? I'm guessing the snow load is just enough in most cases.

  11. comment
    Comment #35888341

    Colombia don't worry I made that mistake and one engineer was trying to get my address to send me "the shirt"

  12. comment
    Comment #35887641

    We should piss off google and standardize around chatgpt.txt

  13. comment
    Comment #35887534

    Came for the comments, comments didn't disappoint!

  14. comment
    Comment #35832417

    It probably should be in the internet age. There is a huge cottage industry out there for fixing prices. I hope that the feds discover all the OTHER companies out there that are si…

  15. comment
    Comment #35798390

    Technically does that mean the FTC can literally go after all the companies for collusive price fixing?

  16. comment
    Comment #35641675

    Cool, thanks for letting me know.

  17. comment
    Comment #35641034

    Yikes, what's the chance just enough rockets will cause the next one to crash and blow up in Miami?

  18. comment
    Comment #35482974

    I am 43, definitely not my experience when I was growing up in CA. When did the kids go from "good - well behaved" to "bad -poorly behaved"? Honest question - I really don't know a…

  19. comment
    Comment #35462409

    Is it just me or is it really really really slow?

  20. comment
    Comment #35462190

    Exactly 2100 left as of time of writing 4:56pm PT https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dang

  21. comment
    Comment #35436027

    you get it.

  22. comment
    Comment #35435920

    Nothing useful, just an insult. ok. Can we talk to each other like we're friends or co-workers at least?

  23. comment
    Comment #35435692

    Please let LLMs become the "next blockchain" (in terms of keeping our jobs). First off, yes blockchain was just horrible. I think generative AI is actually worth the time and energ…

  24. comment
    Comment #35435632

    Probably at minimum something running in a sandbox like Docker.

  25. comment
    Comment #35388629

    Like big oil, it sounds like there is enough "infrastructure" out there that allows them to move the price fixing to third party companies that "recommend" prices for stuff.