Viewing profile — rgifford
rgifford
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 19, 2016, 4:23 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 739
- Public activity
- 113 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rgifford
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
story
Ask HN: Protective Puts for Equity Compensation?
How risky is it to buy protective puts on your equity compensation (for publicly traded companies)? I've heard companies sometimes have a clause in employment agreements against op…
-
comment
Comment #38104902
LLMs have been around since the 50s. Chomsky has plenty to say on them [1]. It's not half as rosy as the current hype cycle. 1. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chom…
-
comment
Comment #38104789
The machine building itself is end game. At that point you're suggesting singularity. I don't see how any profession survives that. There's so much hype around AI right now, it's a…
-
comment
Comment #36939429
Sociopaths, the clueless and losers. This great essay analyzing The Office argues that in a modern business context you're one of the three. [1] Those "functional elites" you menti…
-
comment
Comment #36730931
> That would be a bad bet. It's a terrible bet. But it's the direction American corporate leadership has overwhelmingly been heading for the past couple decades [1] [2]. I get the …
-
comment
Comment #36728151
I agree: Conflict resolution, public speaking, salesmanship -- they're all valuable. They make for better people in this world. When it comes to how these traits translate to the s…
-
comment
Comment #36727592
You're missing what the previous commenter said. There are a lot of ways in which companies can succeed simply by their timing, or a couple incredibly lucky early hires, or first m…
-
comment
Comment #36410097
Lack of corporate regulation and labor organization have led to a real asymmetrical arrangement for workers. It's a classic power imbalance. CEO-to-worker pay is at its highest lev…
-
comment
Comment #36099249
Oddly I quite like these people -- provided they're internally and externally consistent. It's refreshing to say, "you're being an asshole" and have a friend go, "oh my bad, I do t…
-
comment
Comment #34794843
I don't own multifamily property in SF, so I'm not whining about my ability to do anything. When tenants rights are restrictive enough property owners view tenants as a liability a…
-
comment
Comment #34784465
The vacancy rate doesn't tell the whole story. Short term rentals and self reporting likely mask the effect I've mentioned. I generally agree, SFs problem is 100% supply. But I thi…
-
comment
Comment #34784349
People buying a second home are not the problem. A healthy housing market needs rental housing stock. We have to have places for people in transitory phases of life, for people str…
-
comment
Comment #34784247
> the casual way you say "you could evict" makes me think you don't appreciate that that's someone's home... It's their home and your property. I'm not advocating anything crazy. A…
-
comment
Comment #34784109
Why are these properties vacant? I'm pretty familiar as a renter and property owner with tenants rights in SF. If I were to buy a duplex in the city I would never ever ever rent ou…
-
comment
Comment #34784015
I posted something to this effect elsewhere, so forgive me for repeating myself. I do want to get your take though. First, the implementation of the fine isn't so important as the …
-
comment
Comment #34783793
> Most people don't think you should be able to buy up a precious thing and squander it. What does it mean to "squander" and who decides? I'm pretty familiar as a renter and proper…
-
comment
Comment #34783279
It's pretty coercive. Taxes are levied against transactions. A tax in the absence of a transaction is really just a fine. And fining people for not selling something violates most …
-
comment
Comment #34697163
> ...unless the org is completely dysfunctional they are responsible for the ultimate deliverables. This is true in theory if everyone has perfect knowledge. In practice I've never…
-
comment
Comment #34457356
Yeah, bullshitting is draining. I wonder, why? Sisyphus was condemned to aimlessly push a rock forever, but isn't that basically just the human condition? Most of us convince ourse…
-
comment
Comment #34456717
I guess it's all relative. To be honest, I would be over the moon to never "work" again. Don't wanna be needed, don't wanna have to report to anyone, don't wanna be part of a pyram…
-
comment
Comment #34125090
This is hilarious. You're wrong for like every reason, but I'll give you 3: 1. Berkshire has not significantly outperformed the S&P500 for 20 years. Go take a look, they've basical…
-
comment
Comment #34124835
I have a buddy that's a wealth advisor with a high net worth (100M+) wealth management firm. Wealth preservation -- and really diversification -- is all ultra-high net worth folks …
-
comment
Comment #33456250
I disagree. There's an ableist, patronizing assumption to be analyzed here: People with mental disabilities must have the language used around them carefully policed because they c…
-
comment
Comment #33455793
People who are overweight should not be accused of being similar to corporations that misallocate and overspend (i.e. fat corporation, bloated spending, etc.). Anemic, impotent, ba…
-
comment
Comment #33455510
Are the terms "bald," "stupid," "fat," "anemic," or "impotent" harmful when used abstractly and negatively? Come now. At the root of all of this is an ableist, patronizing assumpti…