Viewing profile — rgbgraph
rgbgraph
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 16, 2023, 11:12 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 147
- Public activity
- 83 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rgbgraph
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #36212718
I've worked on problems much harder than Reddit. Reddit is a trivial problem.
-
comment
Comment #36199948
In applied maths, probably not. In theoretical maths, yes.
-
comment
Comment #36195026
“Show me.” Path A: you’re shown the meme; “lmfao, nice” — now you’ve broken ice or strengthened a bond Path B: “nah” — “whatever” —— Don’t send your kids to a run of the mill publi…
-
comment
Comment #36194323
- Java is majorly boilerplate. - If you map out the entire system, and understand how all the pieces fit together, you can: make something simpler that fulfills reqs/does the same …
-
comment
Comment #36194263
Same reason we (SW engineers) think X field is easy and can be self-taught: the fundamentals are easy to learn, but figuring out where and how to deal with edge cases when they pop…
-
story
Ask HN: Papers to get up to speed on database research
Big ask: does anyone know (or can spare the time and effort to compile a short list) of papers to go from zero to cutting edge in database research? Perhaps too wide of a net to ca…
-
comment
Comment #36187345
Just because it makes you feel seen doesn’t mean it’s baseless. Read Early Life (the author of TFA): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Finnegan In fairness, of all the long-w…
-
comment
Comment #36182819
It helps that the “upper class” is mostly faux, and driven by fashion more than anything innate. Zuckerberg is not upper class in the classical sense. He doesn’t have the resources…
-
comment
Comment #36179316
* Well-rounded in the context of a specific sub-culture, and such The flip side being, a father is not an absolute necessity, so long as there are adults with testosterone-correlat…
-
comment
Comment #36178730
Perhaps it shouldn’t stand the test of time — it should be a reflection if its time, and change with them. Here’s the one, let’s see if it renders:
-
comment
Comment #36178165
If this were another venue, I would reply to this post with a single, solitary nerd emoji. The constitution should be ripped apart and rewritten — if it requires hordes of over-edu…
-
comment
Comment #36174080
Ironically, you’re doing exactly what the parent is describing: being pedantic to prove a point/win an argument because the OP was too hasty and forgot to append “pseudo” to his “i…
-
comment
Comment #36168823
That would require for you to be a well-rounded person that hasn’t optimized for only one facet of the job (e.g. money, technical skill, etc.) — at that point might as well be an e…
-
comment
Comment #36168584
> what the hell is the rest of the world thinking? — “Who wants to work that hard for nothing?” — “We’re a tech company? What do we actually do? Something that: atomizes social rel…
-
comment
Comment #36168481
The money means very little in actuality. Most CEOs are doing it for other reasons besides money (personal enjoyment, thrill, respectability, “duty,” etc.).
-
comment
Comment #36165355
This conversation is going in circles. Linked study equivocating on the overstatement of statin side-effects has the first author as a pharmaceutical consultant (you do not see thi…
-
comment
Comment #36164599
Outlaw modern-day corporate trafficking. You cannot buy pieces of a person; corporations are legally people; you should not be able to buy pieces of them. Remove the corporate veil…
-
comment
Comment #36164525
> "No one has ever said an unkind word to her." Leave no opening for others to be mean towards you. One of those is going about life not trying to push/get things out of people -- …
-
comment
Comment #36164388
Financial engineering as a discipline is insane. Literally the definition of insane: seriously mentally ill and unable to live in normal society [0] -- so detached from the "normal…
-
comment
Comment #36164103
> I'd say that generally it's advisable to take both into consideration given that in most cases the author of a paper likely has more domain expertise than you in that specific ar…
-
comment
Comment #36163966
Then we are at an uncrossable philosophical chasm. I don’t consider 2% ARR huge — especially when the risks of side-effects have been down-played. We can argue about this all we wa…
-
comment
Comment #36163950
I cannot make it anymore clearer: statins reduce your absolute risk of mortality by at most 2%; not smoking reduces your absolute risk by 7%. Statins provide meager benefit for the…
-
comment
Comment #36163915
Testosterone levels are drastically lowered in women going through menopause.
-
comment
Comment #36161434
Generally, you read the papers for their methodology and their data — not for the author commentary; and then make up your own mind. One man’s “benefits of statins for primary prev…
-
comment
Comment #36160070
Golly gee, someone that realizes software engineering isn't entirely just sitting down and pumping out code? Why aren't you in management? (don't tell me... it's because you're hon…