Viewing profile — remy_
remy_
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 27, 2016, 5:00 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 69
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About remy_
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27236356
No inspiration, only work!
-
comment
Comment #27236203
Not the same budget.
-
comment
Comment #23845674
Thanks for the report
-
comment
Comment #23845593
Yes the repository was forked from CakePHP v2, before the framework was moved as a composer dependency, so v2 contributors are shown as Passbolt contributors.
-
comment
Comment #23844372
It's the same model than redhat, you buy a subscription, and the software checks if you have a valid subscription. Nothing is stopping you from modifying the source to remove that …
-
comment
Comment #23842543
Hi passbolt developer here, the reason for building on top of CakePHP was mostly: - it's been audited multiple time (last in date was by Cure53, financed by mozilla foundation) - c…
-
comment
Comment #23842499
The paid version is also distributed under Open Source license, but is not free (as in free beer).
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #20916498
Passbolt team was actually part of the Mailvelope project that did this. Integration setup is not easy / very user friendly, that's why it's not the default on Mailvelope.
-
comment
Comment #18494547
mariadb / mysql? matomo / piwik.pro? It seems mostly done by the original developers however and not a new 3rd party.
-
comment
Comment #17226891
That may be true for gitlab, but it's not the case for all the development tools. Like good luck running a selenium grid with 10min of maintenance per month.
-
comment
Comment #17226359
In practice it's more than "ends-justify-the-means", it's a matter of how much time free software developers have and what they want to spend time on. For every alternative tools t…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #14818028
Passbolt, give it a try! https://www.passbolt.com/
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #12055923
Because the binary is served from a marketplace that works with an app that you trust and that will verify the package signature. Or, the web browser does not behave like a package…
-
comment
Comment #12055819
Fair enough, whatever is the easiest for the attacker :). I'm checking Cyph and its "Trust On First Use" concept. Very interesting.
-
comment
Comment #12055636
Because if you serve the library responsible for the encryption from the server, an attacker can perform a man in the middle attack and change that library. This will change when b…
-
comment
Comment #12030802
> - Do you have programmer APIs other than JS? He probably means SOAP, Corba, etc. not just REST/JSON.
-
comment
Comment #11602313
Thanks for the suggestions. We'll definitely come up with a feature/roadmap page shortly. As for the demo account it is a bit more complicated, but we'll look into it.