Viewing profile — relequestual
relequestual
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 16, 2011, 5:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 125
- Public activity
- 53 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About relequestual
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #46086597
The JSON Schema community would LOVE some more detailed feedback on this. We would ideally like to do that in our slack or via a GitHub Discussion. Can you reach either of those OK…
-
comment
Comment #37641454
The team at JSON Schema finally got access to deeper network traffic analytics via CloudFlare. We knew there were lots of requests being made, but details were limited. We dive int…
- story
-
comment
Comment #37207073
We (JSON Schema) did a case study/interview with the guy behind it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yYTxLZZk58&list=PLHVhS4Tj1Y...
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #35048746
Here's a YouTube playlist of 6 case studies with companies of various sizes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkziMQD7pqQ&list=PLHVhS4Tj1Y... There are also two written case studies…
-
story
Ask HN: How does/should open source projects handle non-technical conflict?
I'm in the process of forming a charter for a well established open source standards project. Part of the charter document includes details about how the Technical Steering Comitte…
-
comment
Comment #34609028
It is not =] Additionally, the value is a "schema" as opposed to a boolean, meaning you can apply a subschema to any additional fields. Useful if you for instance want to make sure…
-
comment
Comment #34609015
Part of the problem is they wrote that site and its content for a specific version of JSON Schema. The `items` keyword no longer takes an array form value in the latest version of …
-
comment
Comment #34593563
Actually, currently, this is not the case. The specification explicitly allows for additional fields for the purposes of extensions. We are considering changing that, and only allo…
-
comment
Comment #34593247
A project exists which does this, and the team even support its development: https://github.com/sourcemeta/alterschema Personally, I'd like to see it become officially supported. W…
-
comment
Comment #34593232
Thanks for sharing. This is useful commentary to see. We try to be helpful to maintainers. If any have questions, the JSON Schema server has an implementers channel! We would like …
-
comment
Comment #34593172
The OP actually created a tool that allows you to upgrade your schemas between versions of JSON Schema. It's pretty neat, and has had the eyes of those who write the spec. https://…
-
comment
Comment #34593153
And this is exactly why we are asking this sort of question. This sort of feedback is useful. Thanks. Some of the people working on the spec have had a similar idea and it may end …
-
comment
Comment #34593073
Watch out for that second link. Not everything there is accurate. If you or anyone has suggestions to improve the docs (first link), filing issues or PRs are more than welcome!
-
comment
Comment #34592998
Could you elaborate where you see the namespacing?
- story
- story
-
story
Ask HN: What’s so hard about good tests?
I was chatting with a friend and we agreed tests are both hard and not hard. Assuming you write tests, I’m curious to see what your responses are to the following: 1. What about te…
- story
-
comment
Comment #28480998
This is correct. If I had used a more complex example, it would have been much harder to follow. This was the simplest. We factor this out for our meta-schema construction due to r…
-
comment
Comment #28480957
Do you mean the article or the specification?
-
comment
Comment #28480948
Expectation of a single schema by existing tooling.