Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — reifyx

reifyx

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jan 27, 2019, 4:40 AM UTC
HN karma
25
Public activity
18 items

About reifyx

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mdtest2; my proof: https://keybase.io/mdtest2/sigs/vkmxqBcsasw0PYC716SnRtcbAwwXx-SwS5ofko43tQc ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40013609

    In Italy I saw a replication of Fra Angelico's Annunciation as a sculpted relief intended for the blind.

  2. comment
    Comment #39335596

    if you work from home, a sticky note with a strong password might be safer than a memorized employee-chosen password

  3. comment
    Comment #33520372

    "Just" is used in chess commentary frequently and usually a bit too flippantly as the speaker hasn't gone through all the necessary calculations as the players have to. Sam Shankla…

  4. comment
    Comment #33290791

    I haven't used this for large deployments but I use it for my personal server and it works perfectly. Almost everything is built in and I can easily write my own custom operations …

  5. comment
    Comment #32632382

    Having played around with Clojure and Scheme for a while (but never got too serious), I always thought homoiconicity and macros were extremely cool concepts, but I never actually r…

  6. comment
    Comment #31924683

    I think both the idea and execution are great. These games would be useful even just as problem statements. I like that each problem clearly defines the desired tone and goals, and…

  7. comment
    Comment #27339741

    Yes, that's exactly what we both agreed on 6 comments ago. The question is, is the ability to delete messages critical enough to require in any possible secure messaging solution, …

  8. comment
    Comment #27335959

    >The premise of cryptographically secure messaging is that you have an adversary recording all your message traffic. Agreed. >Lack of forward secrecy implies, logically, that if yo…

  9. comment
    Comment #27335149

    Your argument is that forward secrecy is important in messaging because forward secrecy is important in messaging? I'm not trying to be argumentative here, I actually don't underst…

  10. comment
    Comment #27334242

    I agree with you there. But is your point that any secure email system must critically have forward secrecy, or its insecure? Even though forward secrecy really only gives you any …

  11. comment
    Comment #27334086

    But this only applies for messages that are deleted on your local device (either manually or through an automatic timer). Otherwise, whatever adversary stole your keys can steal yo…

  12. comment
    Comment #27330798

    Assuming you don't want to keep any "chain state" in between messages (which seems reasonable), you can always consume a fresh one-time key of the recipient for every message. The …

  13. comment
    Comment #27330510

    There's this old picture from a 1986 MIT lecture: https://miro.medium.com/max/4448/1*-yaqXNO1tUwVkUpyOqTT7Q@2x... .

  14. comment
    Comment #27330462

    I don't think people want forward secrecy for their email. If they get a new computer, they probably want all their mail on there, right? Isn't porting over their email efficiently…

  15. story
  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #19010508

    Thanks for the reference. Haven't looked into this in a few years, cool to see something has shown up about it now. I guess Sweedler was just having some fun then? Still curious ab…

  18. comment
    Comment #19010383

    When doing some research for a final project about using Grobner bases for cryptography, I came across an interesting paper titled aptly titled "Why You Cannot Even Hope To Use Gro…