Viewing profile — reificator
reificator
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jun 09, 2017, 2:13 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6,682
- Public activity
- 1,899 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About reificator
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #33003035
You got 'em. Google rarely reveals why they killed someone's account. So we can't prove it was due to email content. For all we know it could just be a dude named Richard who throw…
-
comment
Comment #32448393
In fairness to those learning through YouTube or other modern sources: I learned from books and after finishing the exercises in the books I also had no idea what a "super simple p…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #31882360
If he gets hurt in these videos he'll accrue some medical bills. If some number of kids watch his videos and get hurt mimicking them, he'll accrue a bunch of lawsuits to cover thei…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #31558159
> So the actual volume playing is effectively: > Hardware volume x Windows master volume x Windows app volume x In-app volume > No one wants or needs that level of control. I don't…
-
comment
Comment #31530989
Namespaces do not solve the issue but they do mitigate a specific vector, while also removing a perceived need to preregister crates. There’s no downside beyond “it requires develo…
-
comment
Comment #31335965
It looks like this works well from mobile until you try to edit and the keyboard covers the code. Sliding the animation off screen to make room if a soft keyboard is detected might…
-
comment
Comment #31278260
> It's quite a high bar apparently, and a lot of people out there don't manage it. It's not a high bar. There's just a surprising number of people that are really good at playing l…
-
comment
Comment #31278208
1. Apologies, the posts you replied to were shitting on me so I misinterpreted your comment as agreeing with them. ("you must be fun ~~at parties~~ in taxis" is a common dismissal …
-
comment
Comment #31275689
No I'm just sad that treating someone like a human being is considered a positive and not... you know... the absolute bare minimum someone could do.
-
comment
Comment #31275419
Wait I'm an asshole? For being upset that treating taxi drivers "as a human being" is considered a positive interaction instead of the absolute bare minimum of a respectful member …
-
comment
Comment #31269999
My previous comment, perhaps. My original point, however, was to highlight the fact that "They treated me like a human being" was given as the example of a positive interaction. Wh…
-
comment
Comment #31269895
So our range is somewhere around: - They were OK - They treated me like a human being - They were rude There's no room for "We had an interesting conversation" or "They gave me som…
-
comment
Comment #31269198
> a positive "they treated me like a human being" or a negative "no, they were rude" That's the whole range eh?
-
comment
Comment #31166735
> If you do make it public and add it to a resume I didn’t say anything about adding a link to a resume. This thread has hints of people thinking “I’ll just look up their GitHub if…
-
comment
Comment #31154693
And what if I’m not tracking that in such detail or even thinking about viewing it like that because it’s a side project ? My repos are hidden specifically because I do them for fu…
-
comment
Comment #31140187
This is clearly not true given the number of banks with no physical branches.
-
comment
Comment #31085380
I did not order the list of effects by importance or impact, I ordered them by what came to mind while I was typing. I touched on low to the ground aggro decks in the very next par…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #31079657
> I personally suspect that aggro would completely dominate a separate land deck meta if pushed hard enough. Agreed, I probably should have listed it first. Even in the short term,…
-
comment
Comment #31079575
It’s good for teaching younger players who still have temper problems, but there’s only so much of the game you can experience this way. And don’t expect to get to advanced or expe…
-
comment
Comment #30693783
Their schedules are clearly flexible because they’re already changing them twice a year under the current system.
-
comment
Comment #30692502
They already change schedules though, we just launder it through the time “change” despite clear evidence of costs in both productivity and literal human life.