Viewing profile — reggz
reggz
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 02, 2026, 11:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1
- Public activity
- 7 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About reggz
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47839328
yeah you’re not wrong, but the issue is usually mixing pricing lanes. The clean comparison is plan-only vs plan+overflow vs usage-priced baseline for the same seat/activity assumpt…
-
comment
Comment #47733969
The signal I’d care about is whether they can scope the task, prompt the model, review the output, explain tradeoffs and clean up what the model got wrong.
-
comment
Comment #47443134
can treat each internal agent like a small product: one owner, one budget, and one event ID that bundles retries and tool calls into the true cost per successful outcome. If you on…
-
comment
Comment #47395259
I’d break it into a few separate numbers instead of trying to estimate one blended API cost. We usually look at cost per workflow run, runs per active account, and the heavier path…
-
comment
Comment #47244109
I think there's the work and there's the compute bill. AI mostly changes the work side since you can finish faster but the compute cost is still real and can vary a lot. The way I’…
-
comment
Comment #47226348
If you're paying for model calls, retrieval, or other backend work on each request, charging earlier is a lot easier to justify because usage can literally cost you money while you…
-
comment
Comment #47226085
In practice I’ve found agentic search does improve accuracy on harder queries, but the cost climbs pretty quickly once you move away from a single pass. More steps, more chances to…