Viewing profile — regeland
regeland
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 12, 2015, 3:17 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 22
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About regeland
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #16899956
Disclaimer - I was subscriber 7454 to FB, however I moved on and never used it. I'm a little surprised that the EFF didn't mention the proprietary nature of FB in the article. The …
-
comment
Comment #16475035
What I loved about usenet as the author described was that the "barriers to entry" were pretty high. Because only researchers or highly technically competent people could generally…
-
comment
Comment #15269209
Wow small world. I remember having a similar conversation with George Church circa 2000. Fun times and his vision has come to pass. Great guy.
-
comment
Comment #13996443
It was actually not science that the original ban was based on. Who knows whether the new EPA chief is basing the reversal on science or politics, but the end effect is probably a …
-
comment
Comment #13996296
Exactly. You mean NYT has a headline that is not fact checked? :-)
-
comment
Comment #13996137
It's interesting that not one sentence in the article is from scientists or epidemiologists who published or reviewed the study itself. The scientific evidence that the ban was bas…
-
comment
Comment #11047718
The search for yield... a predicted consequence of 7 years of zero percent interest rates. Last time around it was investors seeking yields in low-quality mortgages. This time, the…
-
comment
Comment #10250114
A IV drip regulator "changes how medical devices are made?" Hardly an example to compete with pacemakers, stimulators, orthopedic implants, biologics, endovascular devices, laprosc…
-
comment
Comment #9986778
Absolutely. The taxi cab industry is example number one for regulatory capture. The foolish talk about "employee rights" for Uber drivers makes no sense. The market will determine …
-
comment
Comment #9667215
Completely. And the claim that "this doesn't impact wifi bandwidth" completely violates the laws of physics. As if the 2.4GHz band isn't junk enough already with noise. And nor is …