Viewing profile — redhat-reallyp
redhat-reallyp
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 14, 2013, 6:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 17
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About redhat-reallyp
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6507192
> Git is similar, except there is no competition/competitor there to befuddle you. You haven't met some of the developers on my team.
-
comment
Comment #6411043
> poof magic we have simple mathematical rules on which the universe runs I'm not arguing against the idea that the universe might be described by simple mathematical rules - after…
-
comment
Comment #6408595
> It's the simplest hypothesis to date that I know of. Therefore, I assign at least a non trivial probability to it. I don't think it's simple at all. What is the role of "mathemat…
-
comment
Comment #6406762
You hit the nail on the head. The real issue is that the force is not considered fundamental , because it is explained by some other model such as spacetime curvature.
-
comment
Comment #6406592
At https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6406551 I'm having a reasoned discussion with someone who responded more substantively to what I wrote. Your petty sniping is not reasoned d…
-
comment
Comment #6406551
> That was a serious hypothesis before this. Heard about Tegmark's level IV multiverse? Of course, I love Tegmark's speculative work. But that's all it is, speculative. It's like r…
-
comment
Comment #6406208
"Illusion" is a misleading way to put it. We experience gravity as a force - we can measure it with devices designed to measure forces. It's not an illusion. However, the model of …
-
comment
Comment #6406139
You're comparing me to the authors of the work? My misunderstanding then, I thought you were comparing my take to that of other commenters. "try to be specific" I did post specific…
-
comment
Comment #6406085
Perhaps you missed the part of my very short comment where I wrote "I'm not dismissing that the work could have value, but the article makes claims that go far beyond anything that…
-
comment
Comment #6405245
"Quite a few smart people seem excited by it" Why aren't you asking them for their qualifications, then? Serious question, think about what your choice implies. Is it that "you wan…
-
comment
Comment #6405198
I'm not questioning whether the work has value, but the article is hyping it way beyond justification.
-
comment
Comment #6403835
"it contains signs of a genuine conceptual breakthrough." It contains claims of such signs, which seems to be the point of this fluff piece. Alarm bells should go off when you read…
-
comment
Comment #6387709
"without qualification of their exact experience "how often" it is really hard to tell the bias in that statement wouldn't you agree?" No, because many people have experience which…
-
comment
Comment #6386575
This is a content-free article. It boils down to "we've committed to CentOS, so that's what we prefer to use." The claim that "in our experience, [Debian/Ubuntu] are not nearly as …