Viewing profile — red75prime
red75prime
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 24, 2015, 9:27 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,284
- Public activity
- 1,269 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About red75prime
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49206674
Shouldn't this 236-year-old paper be updated in accordance with, say, neuroeconomics research on how provenance influences aesthetic taste?
-
comment
Comment #49205573
I think it's obvious that repeatedly noting that the absolute perfection isn't achieved yet is an absolutely useless way of tracking progress. No? BTW, when was the last time Tesla…
-
comment
Comment #49202602
> the LLMs were trained to mimic how people speak (write) It's a foundational model (fresh from autoregressive pretraining) that approximates the probability distribution of human …
-
comment
Comment #49194436
Then robots begin cleaning dishes too. And the other members aren't happy, because what's the point, we are here not for the dishes, but for the process.
-
comment
Comment #49165954
I believe that the decentralization of manipulation (taken in a very broad sense as an effort to modify people's views) spells trouble for democracies. The mass media of old, with …
-
comment
Comment #49162557
I'm trying to understand what's going on in the head of people who are certain that LLMs can't be intelligent. And it proves to be a daunting task. Have you tried to reflect on you…
-
comment
Comment #49160752
Why do you think that intelligence of a Turing-complete system trained on human data can be likened to a Russell's teapot? At least, don't you think that the recent mathematical re…
-
comment
Comment #49158512
It's a negative in your worldview where "intelligence can't be a computation" is an axiom or something close. To me this worldview is sloppy thinking.
-
comment
Comment #49158322
There is no reason to think that teapots were sent into orbit or spontaneously formed there. Likewise, there is no reason to think the brain employs super-Turing or quantum computa…
-
comment
Comment #49157162
OK. A more pointed question. What do you know about intelligence that allows you to exclude LLMs with CoT from the category of intelligent systems with certainty?
-
comment
Comment #49156609
Apophatic intelligence? "We don't know what intelligence is, but LLMs with CoT are certainly not it despite being Turing-complete." Watching for unexpected failure modes is surely …
-
comment
Comment #49151971
> AI is not deterministic, it will be making tons of mistakes. Just set the sampling temperature to zero and remove any unintended non-determinism during the parallel computation o…
-
comment
Comment #49141460
Someone says "cars are so comfortable now." Someone else responds "In my experience they are no better than in the 80s." Isn't it prudent to point that the second person drives Mir…
-
comment
Comment #49140845
The AI you are talking about is a low-inference-cost model optimized for massive throughput. It's not like every model has the same amount of those shortcomings.
-
comment
Comment #49137224
Yeah, I should have said RL, not RLVR. The point is RL interacts with external world, while autoregressive pretraining is limited to the passive ingestion, and RLHF relies on a mod…
-
comment
Comment #49136596
Here's another technical point: > They're word-association mechanisms with no embodiment and no way to associate the text vectors they manipulate with real-world phenomena. This is…
-
comment
Comment #49107356
"Repeating what they've seen" could be, depending on their generalization abilities, something like low-n-gram Markov chain, repeating of surface-level speech patterns, repeating r…
-
comment
Comment #49106323
Capability or outcome...or internal structure. What does "glorified autocomplete" say in an ontological sense exactly? Nah. It's just a lazy dismissal. BTW, autoregressive pretrain…
-
comment
Comment #48965124
They probably can't order tofu. It would be B12-fortified oatmeal or something like this.
-
comment
Comment #48955760
> where and when the LLM use is justified and where it is not while being bombarded with articles like "AI makes things worse", "AI consumes all the water" and the like
-
comment
Comment #48947443
> So what if your image classifier thinks a cat is an impala? For starters, the artificial neural network is the only instrument we have for sufficiently robust image classificatio…
-
comment
Comment #48943649
> https://youtu.be/C4NQNeSO2vs?si=epkxhVXpypOCppGW "VLAs fine-tuned on human demonstrations overfit. Here's how to mitigate it." Er, OK, I guess. But I think that Waymo uses mitiga…
-
comment
Comment #48942420
> I did crack up seeing a martini glass presented to the camera, then float in place on it's own It's just a cheap video-generation model doing its thing. I wonder if the orchestra…
-
comment
Comment #48941769
Non-trivial percentage of people work in the real world until they do something stupid and work no more. It's not real autonomy, not yet. It's a matter of degree. Sorry, I don't wa…
- comment