Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — readitalready

readitalready

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jan 26, 2026, 1:58 AM UTC
HN karma
341
Public activity
141 items

About readitalready

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48100160

    [flagged]

  2. comment
    Comment #48099822

    [flagged]

  3. comment
    Comment #48099631

    [flagged]

  4. comment
    Comment #48098698

    How do you think the tests were generated? You don't actually think I look at the code, do you?

  5. comment
    Comment #48097615

    I don't micromanage it. I let my projects custom linter micromanage it. Every project should have a custom linter for their tech stack. It would check for not just syntax errors, b…

  6. comment
    Comment #48097568

    I let agents break things 30 changes down the line. If something breaks, I add a check to my project validator and start over, with the validator providing instructions on what was…

  7. comment
    Comment #48075453

    This flow is really for LLM consumption, since Markdown spec documents are for LLMs anyways. And you can always write a JSON-to-markdown converter for human use (actually, LLMs rem…

  8. comment
    Comment #48072661

    I moved from Markdown to JSON for all spec writing about 9 months ago. Although not HTML, it still has the same benefits. Claude and the other models are just so much more reliable…

  9. comment
    Comment #48039098

    Not for me. 2 Claude Max 20x accounts here both at high usage on weekly allotments.

  10. comment
    Comment #48032259

    This probably started because of Andrej Karpathy's complaint about deployment being more painful than coding itself.

  11. comment
    Comment #48025011

    The point isn't to save money. The point is to make money. And all those companies that are failing because of their fabs, they MADE money because of the fabs. Intel is now on its …

  12. comment
    Comment #48024706

    Your custom linters don't check architectural design? linters statically check code and provide deterministic recommendations. LLMs are used to make judgement. I specifically write…

  13. comment
    Comment #48021623

    No fixing the mess definitely does not take longer than writing it oneself. Your linter should identify all issues - including architectural and stylistic choices - and the AI agen…

  14. comment
    Comment #48017927

    Come on Apple at least start the process of building your own fabs. License some of the processes if you must. Otherwise you will always be at the mercy of fabs that are more focus…

  15. comment
    Comment #47977365

    I think companies are charged API prices vs individual prices. That alone is 10x for Anthropic. Not sure though.

  16. comment
    Comment #47975104

    No, you CAN'T raise prices because no one will buy them, destroying your brand and your business. And you won't have supply anyways. There is no scenario where not having a fab is …

  17. comment
    Comment #47975073

    OMM 0910 is the AI Jesus. We've literally seen this movie before.

  18. comment
    Comment #47970139

    Apple doesn't own TSMC. TSMC is putting Apple in the back burner in favor of Nvidia and other high margin companies. They are literally being limited by TSMC (as well as the DRAM m…

  19. comment
    Comment #47970126

    You can easily end up like AMD or Intel spending years with your own fab that’s uncompetitive. You could. Or you could have no fab and no supply of chips for your business.

  20. comment
    Comment #47968889

    They really need to build their own fabs at this point. AI is going to kill their ASIC and DRAM supply chain if they don't. "Real men have fabs." - Jerry Sanders, first CEO of AMD.…

  21. comment
    Comment #47954407

    Took getting their asses handed to them in a war to realize this.

  22. comment
    Comment #47940707

    lol no. LLMs are infinitely more capable than programmers. People really do think too highly of themselves.

  23. comment
    Comment #47940287

    That's like saying "the programmers are so terrible you have to think ahead of them so they don't make mistakes".

  24. comment
    Comment #47936822

    All the CAD and modelings tools have their own scripting languages that LLMs can write to, so you can just use that directly without any built-in LLM support. There will probably b…

  25. comment
    Comment #47936625

    It's because LLMs will soon start building real-world objects via CAD. This is the first step. Look at things like the Adam plugin for Onshape. Works great with Opus. It built a to…