Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rdlecler1

rdlecler1

HN member
Joined
Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 9:05 PM UTC
HN karma
3,511
Public activity
1,466 items

About rdlecler1

Founding Partner of AgFunder, one of the most active foodtech and agtech VCs. BA in Philosophy. MSc in CompSci (ALife = AI, virtual robotics, developmental and genetic algorithms); PhD from Yale in theoretical and computational evolutionary biology (Gene regulatory networks, bioinformatics, whole genome analysis) working under a MacArthur Fellow. Published in Nature, Forbes, TechCrunch, Harvard Business Review. Interviewed by WSJ, Bloomberg TV, CNBC.

Contact: rob@agfunder.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46623115

    that wavelength penetrates the skin. you need to be around 222nm for human safety uviquity has prototypes of a 220nm solid state chip they’ll commercialize next year (we’re an inve…

  2. comment
    Comment #43017084

    You clearly have deep understanding of base reality and the emergence of complexity. So please share an actual argument.

  3. story
  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #41804380

    It’s the other way around. Waymo may do the job exquisitely, but exquisite is also expensive. Telsa has always constrained their system to lower cost hardware. It’ll be easier for …

  6. comment
    Comment #41786835

    [flagged]

  7. comment
    Comment #41730681

    Power eventually turns a high trust society into a low trust society when that power is used to one’s own advantage.

  8. comment
    Comment #41716333

    Think different. No kidding. No one is going to think this.

  9. comment
    Comment #41710794

    YC is putting through 200+ companies per batch and making a tiny investment. It’s far more efficient to swallow the occasional bad bet than to do a lot due diligence… Now the VCs t…

  10. comment
    Comment #41627106

    This is a great point. LLMs may flood an app with more features without making it better. At the end I do the day you still need to make something people love. AI may help you buil…

  11. comment
    Comment #41364629

    Remember there is still survival bias here. We’re not seeing the complications from people who died of the infection.

  12. comment
    Comment #41051930

    Do driverless cars make all this moot?

  13. comment
  14. comment
    Comment #40972454

    Super interesting.

  15. comment
    Comment #40971540

    This sits in a larger field of complexity theory and complex adaptive systems. There was also some interesting work on “Artificial Life” although that research program seems to hav…

  16. comment
    Comment #40970682

    I could have bogged the essay down with qualifiers to address all the potential straw man objections, but that didn't seem productive. It's easy to take an uncharitable view on thi…

  17. comment
    Comment #40970055

    I'm not arguing that this approximator is necessary (not sufficient) for this class of networks. I've proposed some conjectures on what we might expect to see, but there are certai…

  18. comment
    Comment #40969894

    This is a great question, and I don't yet have an answer. I'm going to butcher this description, so please be charitable, but functionally, the attention mechanism reduces the dime…

  19. comment
    Comment #40969078

    More generally there’s graph neural networks, for instance, but not you’re including many dynamic networks that are not open-ended or evolvable. The idea is to identify common dyna…

  20. comment
    Comment #40968562

    Genetic systems code gene regulatory networks. I spent most of the essay on them.

  21. comment
    Comment #40965355

    Those neurons are being trained the day we were born. Reality corresponds to about 11 million bits per second. What I suspect’s happening is that we train higher and higher levels …

  22. comment
    Comment #40965335

    Activation functions are implementation details. See appendix for the general formula.

  23. comment
    Comment #40964657

    No, graphs are too inclusive.

  24. comment
    Comment #40964631

    The original papers were published in scientific journals. More assertive claims aren’t kosher.

  25. comment
    Comment #40964627

    You’re right. Writing is hard—especially when you’re cutting across disciplines. I wasn’t happy with the writing, but I stand by the claims.