Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rcafdm

rcafdm

HN member
Joined
Tue, Oct 25, 2016, 1:12 PM UTC
HN karma
48
Public activity
42 items

About rcafdm

http://randomcriticalanalysis.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #22572489

    Outcomes are determined by more than health system inputs alone (indeed, it has little to do with health care in the developed world), and costs have much to do with the intensity …

  2. comment
    Comment #22298555

    This is my blog. I'll check comments later on and respond if anyone has serious questions or comments.

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #21869061

    > Your findings are not mutually exclusive with other theories about the underlying causes of high U.S. healthcare expenditure, such as a chronic lack of price transparency. My fin…

  5. comment
    Comment #21851139

    > We spend 17.4% of GDP on healthcare. The OECD average is 9.5% Health spending is almost entirley explained by income levels, especially in the long-run. The US spends much more b…

  6. comment
    Comment #21851008

    > Obesity is not an independent variable Nothing is perfect, but most experts believe this has little to do with healthcare today because healthcare interventions tend not to be ef…

  7. comment
    Comment #21850969

    > The obesity explanation doesn't pass the sniff test. Canada is 12% less obese than the U.S., but it spends 6% less of its GDP on healthcare. It's my blog (RCA). My argument is th…

  8. comment
    Comment #21793527

    > a) many (perhaps the majority, don't have time to source now) of the bankruptcies in the US are due to medical issues and spending The vast majority of medical bankruptcies have …

  9. comment
    Comment #21793466

    I'm not a language zealot (most languages/frameworks come with pros and cons) and I use R and the tidyverse quite regularly, but "performant" is not a word I'd associate with the t…

  10. comment
    Comment #21747199

    > Yet 81 percent of the leading health economists agreed with the statement, “The primary reason for the increase in the health sector’s share of GDP over the past 30 years is tech…

  11. comment
    Comment #21743758

    Thanks. I haven't seriously considered that before, but I may put one up!

  12. comment
    Comment #21743546

    > 1. You didn’t. https://i0.wp.com/randomcriticalanalysis.com/wp-content/uplo... > 2. Asymptotic growth towards 100% certainly sounds unsustainable. "Sounds" isn't an argument and …

  13. comment
    Comment #21742944

    I (RCA) have been meaning to dedicate a blog post to this topic exclusively and quantify the root causes in considerable detail. In short, yes, I believe globalization and, specifi…

  14. comment
    Comment #21742710

    The point is that almost all of what people have termed "medical bankruptcy" has approximately nothing to do with healthcare costs. It has to do with income/career disruption assoc…

  15. comment
    Comment #21742540

    One can come up with a narrative to support almost any argument. The question is, do you have data to support it, is it credible, and how much can it actually explain? The truth is…

  16. comment
    Comment #21741821

    1, I can fit the US on a linear trend amongst high income countries. 2, there’s no necessary reason why increasing health share with rising real income is unsustainable. We can and…

  17. comment
    Comment #21739962

    I’m not sure what you’re getting at. Obviously, healthcare must be paid for somehow and it’s a fair assumption workers bear most of the incidence. However, the role of real incomes…

  18. comment
    Comment #21739792

    You absolutely can in real terms. https://randomcriticalanalysis.com/2019/12/03/no-means-no-th... Also while I agree that 100% of a GDP is a reasonable approximation of an upper li…

  19. comment
    Comment #21739601

    My analysis strongly suggests costs strongly track with income levels. Relative Prices rise with income, but purchasing power also rises, so it's not necessarily less affordable re…

  20. comment
    Comment #21739340

    Yes, I'm the author of the blog (RCA). No, I haven't studied this narrow question, though it's somewhat tangential to the arguments I've advanced (outcomes; prices; aggregate costs…

  21. comment
    Comment #21739183

    US also has "programs" and generally spends more on preventative medicine. Further, actual medical evidence suggests medicine doesn't have good treatments for obesity (getting peop…

  22. comment
    Comment #21738959

    The exact numbers depend on the source/methodology, but all credible estimates show large differences and these differences imply large effects for mortality rates [in the broader …

  23. comment
    Comment #21738887

    No, but this is addressed in my post. Australia's obesity rate is substantially lower, plus they suffer from lower homicide, drug abuse, and the like. More generally, the diminishi…

  24. comment
    Comment #21738848

    My point is that there's very little to suggest US healthcare is uniquely ineffective. There rapidly diminishing returns to health spending and US outcomes are badly handicapped by…

  25. comment
    Comment #19920995

    > That argument is either wrong or tautological. There are two distinct claims here. (1) National health expenditures are overwhelmingly determined by the resources available to ho…