Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rbyers

rbyers

HN member
Joined
Fri, Aug 15, 2014, 5:37 PM UTC
HN karma
37
Public activity
16 items

About rbyers

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #36916514

    In the case of blink-dev, yeah moderators like me. But AFAIK we didn't block any replies there at all because nobody in that forum was making threats or anything like that. I also …

  2. comment
    Comment #36916304

    > Some things just aren't consistent, and I don't believe that you know what "the openness of the web" means, or really care :-). I certainly could have done a better job trying to…

  3. comment
    Comment #36916209

    Thank you!

  4. comment
    Comment #36916198

    Did you read the rest of the thread? Plenty of really good constructive yet forceful feedback on that thread which I was applauding and celebrating.

  5. comment
    Comment #36916185

    I think it's pretty disingenuous to suggest that I "tarred all opposition as criminals". Still I admit my wording could have been better, please see follow-up: https://groups.googl…

  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #36916153

    Did you see my point later in the thread about moderators like me explicitly approving all the posts which were arguing forcefully (but respectfully) against WEI? I think it's pret…

  8. comment
    Comment #36825525

    I'm one of the blink API owners who would need to approve this feature if it were to ship in Chrome. I outlined some of my thoughts on this earlier here: https://groups.google.com/…

  9. comment
    Comment #9266835

    This is a complicated set of trade offs and I've argued on both sides of the fence so I can't pretend to imply the decision is at all clear cut. But let me respond to a couple deta…

  10. comment
    Comment #9264555

    I think there is a valid concern here. But what we're seeing in practice from many major frameworks and apps is that they're unifying events anyway and special-casing the device ty…

  11. comment
    Comment #9264538

    Of course Microsoft has now shown the DO value compatibility enough to implement Touch Events, and is even one of the most active members in the Touch Events community group workin…

  12. comment
    Comment #8183733

    > I'm pretty sure Microsoft is going to go full steam ahead with pointer events. Note that even Microsoft acknowledges the "touch events are here to stay" argument: IE mobile now s…

  13. comment
    Comment #8183276

    Agreed! We had a great "input face-to-face" meeting at Microsoft back in June, and the collaboration between IE, Safari, Firefox and Chrome teams seems better than ever. Despite ou…

  14. comment
    Comment #8183266

    Right, we (Chrome team) definitely care about multi-input-device scenarios (I started at Google by leading the chrome work for the chromebook pixel). We're just trying to project o…

  15. comment
    Comment #8183249

    There was a delay, but we worked past it. The web would definitely be a better place if Apple would participate in the input API standardization process though.

  16. comment
    Comment #8183243

    Well said. We're deeply committed on the blink team to making such polyfills and frameworks easy (eg. it's a big part of why we shipped touch-action in blink). That's where the fig…