Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rbarooah

rbarooah

HN member
Joined
Sat, May 31, 2008, 12:11 AM UTC
HN karma
1,972
Public activity
933 items

About rbarooah

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #5018931

    There's plenty of joking and 'it'll never work' here, but doesn't this worry anyone at all? A system that 'knows you better than you know yourself', means a system that is able to …

  2. comment
    Comment #5014868

    I don't see anyone saying it's not Google's right to do these things. People are simply saying that it looks as though Google is attacking Microsoft.

  3. comment
    Comment #5014044

    I'm not sure what you mean by 'keep the language in their own privileged domain' actually means, but I do agree that it is Apple's strategy to invest in Objective-C above other lan…

  4. comment
    Comment #5013702

    This seems like a long way of saying that you don't like Objective-C because it's not cross platform, and that you've decided instead to write all your mobile code in Lua and to ma…

  5. comment
    Comment #5013646

    It's not clear whether you are actually advocating this kind of interpretation of Ayn Rand's position or not. It seems to me that the principle of government being solely to protec…

  6. comment
    Comment #5013517

    Those are interesting pieces, and I feel as though my time was well spent reading them. I can't see what they have to do with this argument though. The first one is basically a spe…

  7. comment
    Comment #5005498

    I commend you for trying to offer an alternative, seriously! Google may not have hand curation, but they do use manual raters as one of their signals. It's also true that new conte…

  8. comment
    Comment #5004478

    I agree with you that Google should be free to have their own editorial voice, and it seems like a really bad idea for that to be interfered with directly by government. However, a…

  9. comment
    Comment #5004167

    Obviously people can argue for ever over the merits of one design decision over another but as someone who has programmed in Java for more than a decade, and has used Scala and Clo…

  10. comment
    Comment #4997573

    There obviously is a trade-off between the strength of the language and the number of people who will click through. Maybe, but I'm not arguing about the 'strength' of the language…

  11. comment
    Comment #4994382

    Presumably you don't judge my second suggestion 'mealy mouthed' otherwise you'd have quoted that instead. So even by your judgement of what is 'mealy mouthed', an effective and acc…

  12. comment
    Comment #4993813

    Nobody except you is suggesting a mealy-mouthed warning - that's a straw-man. An accurate and informative statement like: "Google's Scans detected malware , which is known to do ha…

  13. comment
    Comment #4993195

    The valid argument is that it's generally harder to convince people to pay for web content than it is for content on iOS where this product is already successful, presumably becaus…

  14. comment
    Comment #4991707

    Sorry, Android is controlled by a single company.

  15. comment
    Comment #4991604

    I doubt that would change things. iOS users are not price sensitive and Apple doesn't make any pretense that content is free. People who buy into the Apple world are choosing to bu…

  16. comment
    Comment #4991588

    It's not really my conclusion - it's the conclusion from the TWN piece. That said, even though it's not a controlled experiment, the fact that they didn't have feature parity doesn…

  17. comment
    Comment #4991542

    They offer an optional subscription through in-app purchase on iOS. I imagine they get a lot more support that way than they would if they put it on the web with a 'donate' button,…

  18. comment
    Comment #4991533

    They did put the effort in to overcome those issues, only to discover that for every 80 iOS users they had 1 Android user, so they concluded that continuing to do the work wasn't j…

  19. comment
    Comment #4991378

    Clearly you haven't thought this through. Security is sometimes a trade-off but in this case there is no trade-off involved. Google can just as easily block the malware without the…

  20. comment
    Comment #4988505

    I don't see how you reach that conclusion. Twitpic is part of the Twitter ecosystem and is such is certainly competitive with Google's social and photo sharing efforts (i.e. Google…

  21. comment
    Comment #4987766

    I doubt you'd consider it a "minor shortlived inconvenience" if Google informed millions of people that your business was a known distributor of malware. Google can perfectly well …

  22. comment
    Comment #4987680

    If that's what's happening here, then the warning seems good for everyone.. except that the wording is defamatory. Rather than accusing Twitpic of being "a known distributor of mal…

  23. comment
    Comment #4987600

    Google's "advice" in this case is a statement issued to millions of users accusing a competitor of a crime. If it turns out to be true, that's fine. If it's not true, don't you thi…

  24. comment
    Comment #4987456

    Have you actually looked a twitter page that uses Twitpic? The text Chrome produces reads: "Danger: Malware Ahead! Content from twitpic.com, a known malware distributor has been in…

  25. comment
    Comment #3858430

    It sounds as though you are now claiming that Google has already turned the Internet into a Walled Garden but are simply nicer in their policies than anyone else. This is the first…