Viewing profile — rayiner
rayiner
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Dec 29, 2010, 8:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 128,204
- Public activity
- 35,706 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rayiner
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49253048
I don’t know what Iran expected for trying to assassinate Trump back in 2024: https://www.nbcnews.com/investigations/iran-assassination-pl... . Of all the people who weren’t just g…
-
comment
Comment #49252669
Yes, building public infrastructure generally involves paying private contractors to do it. Who do you think builds government buildings?
-
comment
Comment #49250933
That’s the opposite of NIMBYism. Public infrastructure getting built despite inconvenience to affected landowners.
-
comment
Comment #49250920
People need infrastructure. Data centers are infrastructure.
-
comment
Comment #49250263
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49249210
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49249170
Building stuff is good stewardship. We complain about NIMBYs. But with a few relatively modest regulations data centers can be quite friendly. They don’t generate traffic, congesti…
-
comment
Comment #49248412
Interesting. That usage is the opposite of “forever chemicals” though. Isn’t it a good thing GLP-1s don’t permanently change your body?
-
comment
Comment #49247371
I love the block diagram lol.
-
comment
Comment #49247273
GLP-1s aren’t “forever drugs.” They’re eliminated so fast from your system you need to keep taking them to keep the effect. That’s the opposite of a forever drug. If you go off the…
-
comment
Comment #49246310
The article has a bunch of speculation that’s not in the paper: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35387/w353... One key point: > Nor do I find evidence of upward jo…
-
comment
Comment #49243974
Economically, it’s to avoid free-rider effects. This benefit largely seems alien to tech people because the industry inherently has other moats: network effects, data and code in a…
-
comment
Comment #49238760
Man, I loved reading Tom’s articles in BYTE.
-
comment
Comment #49237658
The article even addresses that: > The yacht crew had been operating on a different radio channel, Baker told Forbes. “The assist was already under way” by the time they reviewed t…
-
comment
Comment #49237218
> Even if he was not on his ship, the report is unlikely to boost public opinion of Zuckerberg It’s rare that a paper just admits that it’s slinging mud at someone for something it…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49227979
What you’re describing is “pretext” and it’s a different thing than disparate impact. You can find liability for pretext even when something is facially race neutral. You have to s…
-
comment
Comment #49227921
> which is what seems to be simply necessary to actually make progress against the endlessly inventive evil of racism/sexism Can you give examples of how you think there are “inven…
-
comment
Comment #49226393
> It’s better now by roughly a factor of two per passenger mile. Which is just not that big of a deal for 50+ years of technological development. It doesn't allow you to do anythin…
-
comment
Comment #49226139
Was it a contested proceeding where the person was facing homelessness as the alternative?
-
comment
Comment #49226132
What does “can be” mean? What percentage of the time does eviction result in homelessness?
-
comment
Comment #49226049
> It's called common sense. Is it common sense, or your preconceptions? > Doesn't really matter, your own link provides the average. The “average” eviction doesn’t result in homele…
-
comment
Comment #49224250
> My family has owned brownstones in new york my entire life and their experiences are quite different than yours. So because you have an anecdote, I must be lying? > Your own link…
-
comment
Comment #49224068
Why would you accuse me of making it up? E.g. , https://www.evictpro.us/blog/how-long-does-eviction-take-in-... . This says that in Maryland, a typical timeline for a contested evi…
-
comment
Comment #49223126
That’s not how technology works. We went from first flight in 1903 to a man on the moon in 1969. Then we basically did almost nothing in aerospace for the next 50 years. We never g…