Viewing profile — ravicious

Flow is quite good, but over half of our React codebase is components connected to Redux or Redux Form and unfortunately there are no Flow types for the versions that we use, so ty…

>> When giving feedback, some people say that they are brutally honest > As someone who prefers giving and receiving terse feedback... I would suggest that there's nothing wrong wi…

I left a comment under your post on reddit. For us, JSPM is fast enough and we don't have to run a second server just to serve assets. And, excuse me for saying that, but I found y…

I think JSPM should stress the part about bundling. It's the second person that I see who says "JSPM is slow" and the reason behind this slowness is that they didn't bundle the fil…

> The advantages [ClojureScript] has over ES6 fail to make up for the loss of a huge ecosystem… What kind of "loss of a huge ecosystem" did you have in mind? > …and this only seems…

Maybe instead of creating something entirely new we could improve the existing thing, that is prepend man pages with some examples?

I still think that by preferring composition over inheritance things are just simpler and you don't have to trouble yourself with super or with before/after calls. Maybe I just hav…

Okay, now this certainly feels better than my example and is much more bulletproof than prefixing function names with `_`, thanks.

Sure thing, but could you show an example? Let's say we want the `rename` function be private, this is what I came up with: https://gist.github.com/ravicious/5412eebf8a1934ec7886 I…

What about private functions? For now I just add `_` in front of their names, but the code would look so much cleaner if I had some kind of a `private` keyword.

You don't really need a framework, one can get pretty far without it. Look up Facebook's Flux examples[1] to see how they're doing it. [1] https://github.com/facebook/flux/tree/mas…