Viewing profile — ravi-delia
ravi-delia
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Aug 07, 2020, 4:13 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,321
- Public activity
- 916 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ravi-delia
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45934584
Propellant is still used for rotation control. Reaction wheels can "saturate" if they compensate for rotation more in one direction than the other on net, so propellant is needed t…
-
comment
Comment #43282146
I mean I guess you could say they have different semantics. They're just different types, int and Int64 aren't any more different from each other than Int64 and Int32. You can trea…
-
comment
Comment #43271930
Ok, running this by you one more time. There is a type called "int" in the language. This is a 63-bit signed integer on 64-bit machines, and a 31-bit integer on 32-bit machines. It…
-
comment
Comment #43259913
So the "one bit" you refer to is what makes the standard int 63 bits rather than 64. If you could do things with it it would indeed break the runtime- that's what tells it that you…
-
comment
Comment #43257105
The usual int type is 63 bits. You can get a full 64 bit int, it just isn't the default.
-
comment
Comment #43257021
This is why we never should have invented the phonograph. People who want to listen to music can just buy a record, making it literally impossible for them to perform an activity h…
-
comment
Comment #39376965
The question wasn't "why do protons have +1 charge", it was "why do protons have +1 charge, *considering electrons have -1 charge". The fact that possible charges are restricted to…
-
comment
Comment #39244590
Not so much for takeoff! Most rocket designs better than chemical rockets trade off thrust for specific impulse. That's an improvement in orbit, since delta-v is delta-v. But imagi…
-
comment
Comment #39228633
You know what, that's a sufficiently cursed workflow that it wraps back around to adding nerd cred
-
comment
Comment #38821963
It isn't
-
comment
Comment #38821951
It actually bottoms out pretty low though. The apparent fractal dimension changes over scales, but is sufficient that ruler length really does make a huge distance in coastline len…
-
comment
Comment #38821933
I think what you're referring to is the false proof suggesting that pi=4. That is not what squaring the circle is, and does not in fact become smoother and smoother but rougher and…
-
comment
Comment #38727828
Sure, but if you're gonna have a space heater (and people do) there won't be any difference in efficiency between any possibility, including computers
-
comment
Comment #38593954
Large carnivores are kind of the pricey boondoggles of evolution. They work, they are successful, but they're balanced on a knifes edge. Every step a large carnivore takes consumes…
-
comment
Comment #38244080
I mean this is a crazy thing to know about 37. And we know it!
-
comment
Comment #38244061
In analytic number theory we usually only care about growth rates in a very coarse sense- up to scaling by some constant, and asymptotically. Because the log of any base is precise…
-
comment
Comment #38221448
Population counting isn't an exact science, there were estimates suggesting we hit 8 billion about a year ago. But the 90s are right out- last big milestone was 7 billion in 2011.
-
comment
Comment #38077397
So you can of course multiply some vectors- the real numbers are a vectorspace, and they have a perfectly nice product. Even R^2 can have a nice multiplication- (a,b)(c,d) = (ac - …
-
comment
Comment #38076956
> "Definition" - "Theorem" - "Corollary" structure looks like a silver bullet, it fits very well in a linear format of a book. Unfortunately, this format is totally inadequate when…
-
comment
Comment #38074440
Hmm, I do see where you're coming from. To me, saying math is the study of formal systems is a statement of acceptance and neutrality- we can welcome ultrafinitists and non-standar…
-
comment
Comment #38074436
> I think in 50 years we will look back on the way pure math was written today as a great tragedy of this age that is thankfully lost to time. That could very well be true. I mean …
-
comment
Comment #38073552
I think that "when you proceed to applications" is the issue there. Applications where? For applications in field theory, the spatial metaphor is exactly incorrect! For application…
-
comment
Comment #38065135
I absolutely see what you're saying with that. I think I'm definitely the target audience of the abstracted definition, but I've long held that every new object should be introduce…
-
comment
Comment #38064139
> To me, each column represents a different dimension of the basis vector space, so the notion that X, Y, and Z might form independent "column spaces" of their own is unintuitive a…
-
comment
Comment #38064073
Axler serves as an adequate first introduction to linear algebra (though it is intended to be a second, more formal, pass through. Think analysis vs calculus), but it isn't intende…