Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — randrews

randrews

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jul 02, 2007, 10:41 PM UTC
HN karma
1,532
Public activity
352 items

About randrews

http://playwithlua.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49158353

    Location: Houston area, TX Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: No Technologies: Primarily Rust, Ruby, JS / TypeScript, Postgres, GraphQL, many others Résumé/CV: http://sevendral.com/r…

  2. comment
    Comment #32232410

    Looking back at what I've said in this thread, it's "free speech is a societal value like honestly and politeness, not just a constitutional right," "I would be in favor of lifting…

  3. comment
    Comment #32230806

    We do not live in a pure democracy, we live in a constitutional republic. Our lawmakers aren't able to create certain laws because of limits on their power in the constitution; one…

  4. comment
    Comment #32230152

    Hmm. So the way I interpret this is: true free speech lets people say things that are wrong, and leads to people believing things that are wrong. A company that allows it will perf…

  5. comment
    Comment #32229641

    Ads in general are probably something society doesn't want, because you have to pay people (in the form of ad-supported content) to look at them. You might say that most people in …

  6. comment
    Comment #32229297

    I actually think we should allow cigarette ads again, I don't think anyone is harmed by being able to see a sign telling them something. But also, think about it this way: isn't th…

  7. comment
    Comment #32229126

    I really don't think you're arguing in good faith here. This is a very common tactic for people of your political alignment, at least on HN: to nitpickily demand sources for comple…

  8. comment
    Comment #32228655

    > It just doesn't allow ads that say "Glock is the best pistol". Until, well, yesterday (edit: not yesterday, that says "June." My mistake), it was illegal in Germany to advertise …

  9. comment
    Comment #32228402

    Yep. The answer here is that Hulu should probably run the ads. Free speech is more than an amendment, it's a social value that should be respected by everyone, not just the governm…

  10. comment
    Comment #32228382

    I always wonder about these sorts of comments. Do you think sources for these easily-googleable facts don't exist, or that the pretty uncontroversial events I'm talking about didn'…

  11. comment
    Comment #32228188

    Pretty predictable responses. > Are you somehow implying Google and Facebook are run by Democrats Again, there was a White House office made specifically to coordinate these platfo…

  12. comment
    Comment #32227906

    Absolutely. Gavin Newsom has signed into law a bill to ban ads for firearms. Google and Facebook already ban that as well. If you have no problem with that then why should you have…

  13. comment
    Comment #32227540

    Perhaps Hulu recognizes that some people just want to watch TV and not be bothered by campaign ads. Also perhaps I'd be more sympathetic to the Democrats here if exactly this sort …

  14. comment
    Comment #32216947

    Parts are, but other parts, like the gulf coast, have plenty of water. Texas is not the giant desert you see in cowboy movies.

  15. comment
    Comment #32210833

    I think we're arguing over terminology. But "it takes resources to create" is not the same thing as "it stores those resources." That's the whole misconception with Bitcoin. It tak…

  16. comment
    Comment #32208745

    > doesn't it also take resources to create baseball cards, art, books etc. Baseball cards are generally valued more than an equivalent-size rectangle of cardstock. Books are priced…

  17. comment
    Comment #32208576

    A store of value allows you to get the value back out: if I spend a bunch of money and effort mining iron ore, or growing wheat, or building a house, I have the ore or wheat or hou…

  18. comment
    Comment #32206725

    I have a hard time believing that anyone actually falls in that category. No living grandparents who remember the great depression? No memories of 2008? And even if they were in a …

  19. comment
    Comment #32206681

    I'm not shrugging. I think you shouldn't be allowed to do fraudulent ads for investments, and that the loophole of "it's not USD so it's not a real, regulated investment" is wrong.…

  20. comment
    Comment #32206142

    This is hard to write. In 2015 I joined a local club for electronics hobbyists. It was great, we met every other week, had show-and-tell presentations of the things we were learnin…

  21. comment
    Comment #32003082

    So you're saying, in the scenario where someone asks directly "will this company lay anyone off," you'd rather the company deflect the question and not answer it than just say "no?…

  22. comment
  23. comment
    Comment #32003014

    I'm not well-connected, and if you have a bunch of experience on your resume, you're probably established enough. Send your resume out to a bunch of companies. Expect that most of …

  24. comment
    Comment #31992200

    I think you might be putting a bit too much stock in what a recruiter thinks. Recruiters generally do not know the first thing about the industry they're recruiting for, and in my …

  25. comment
    Comment #31980017

    As much as I want to agree with you, and as much as I usually go by that rule myself... The place I work at now said, in March 2020, that they weren't going to do any layoffs. And,…