Viewing profile — randbyte
randbyte
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 14, 2026, 2:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 11
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About randbyte
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49024088
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #49023652
Blatantly lack of principles.
-
comment
Comment #48985389
Long history of open source projects already have answers on how to monetize a free and complex open source product. - Low development cost: collaborative efforts from open source …
-
comment
Comment #48953738
When people say “US government” they usually mean the federal government…
-
comment
Comment #48947058
Bibi tried many times. Every president before Trump understood the risks and refused the wild plan. Only Trump fell for it. China’s factory outputs are in fact increasing. So is th…
-
comment
Comment #48942845
You think too much. Trump got duped into a gamble and didn’t win as he thought. If the hope is to hurt China it’s unlikely to be working very well. Their energy sources and oil sou…
-
comment
Comment #48747064
In your example, service providers may be allowed to collect IP address or cookies or referer which are either critical to how they provide service (IP and cookies) or part of the …
-
comment
Comment #48513510
> a model that runs on my own machine will never have the capacity of a model that runs in a datacenter. I don’t think so. A local run model only needs to serve one or a few people…
-
comment
Comment #48505734
> Releasing open weights seems to be an effort to slow down competition. Why? I don’t get it. Open weight models enabled a lot more foundational model trainings. I believe R1 was b…
-
comment
Comment #48499432
Instead we got home solar system become very affordable over the past decade. And driving out US manufacturers isn’t even the main goal for China. They know their huge risk on reli…
-
comment
Comment #48499342
I never say these pieces are the equivalent of a cloud platform. What I said is that with them, it is entirely possible for someone to build their own. Why someone wants to do that…
-
comment
Comment #48499275
If you see this as people just want free stuffs you are missing the point. There is an entire different level of danger to allow a few entities to completely own a day to day techn…
-
comment
Comment #48498415
> cloud providers should be commodity They are already. > and should open source all of their platforms Most of the cloud platforms are open source. Linux, container, k8s… it’s ent…
-
comment
Comment #48468222
More like Anthropic’s priorities are not everyone else’s priorities. They are in the consistent culture of being in absolute control and dictating what is good and bad, while takin…
-
comment
Comment #48376936
You examples are great… at supporting my points. CRWD ipo’ed at 7bn and NET at 5bn. Unlike the mega IPOs like abnb and uber and now 10x worse spacex. There is very limited upside l…
-
comment
Comment #48370659
What’s your argument besides name calling? Please have it all, as long as don’t force my passive investments to be part of it.
-
comment
Comment #48370212
If price is fully discovered right after ER then you will see price stabilized right after ER. But in fact post ER prices can wildly differ from the next minute, next day and next …
-
comment
Comment #48365545
> it doesn't really matter because the float will be tiny due to the 6 month lockup. Not really: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/spacex-allow-early-...
-
comment
Comment #48364683
Not after the insiders and investors milked most of the upsides already. As of today: - ABNB right at around their IPO price. - Uber is 75% up… after 6 years. - SNOW came back to b…
-
comment
Comment #48364528
By the time they drop and being kicked out (if they do) the insiders already dumped their shares. Not to mention now all the index fund holders will rush to sell creating even more…