Viewing profile — raesene2
raesene2
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Nov 24, 2011, 11:12 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 139
- Public activity
- 51 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About raesene2
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #24995362
Doesnt look like that comment came from nat? Username for that comment is naikrovek not natfriedman
-
comment
Comment #22820381
Or Robert Seacord’s Effective C
-
comment
Comment #20661709
Shame they didn’t include traffic to security.stackexchange.com . I would have thought that would show a more noticeable change. Also would be interesting to see what tags there sh…
-
comment
Comment #19353870
Not really. They can be used to replace one element of the docker stack, runc
-
comment
Comment #19124597
“Why bother posting this?” - that’s easy, because it might hit the front page of HN and someone from Google might see it and actually apply human reasoning to the problem. And then…
-
comment
Comment #18157728
Fair play, it is getting late :)
-
comment
Comment #15680027
For uk banking systems it is very likely that the passwords are stored symmetrically encrypted with the key stored in an HSM (based on my experience working as an IT security consu…
-
comment
Comment #15363298
If you base off alpine, you can get useful containers quite a lot smaller than 100MB. One example i use is an agent i deploy to kubernetes clusters to do some security scanning. Th…
-
comment
Comment #14825909
Have you tried pocket? I used to keep a load of bookmarks but the problem was that after a while many of the source urls would die off. So something like pocket is very handy as it…
-
comment
Comment #14182222
Well there is, but it's not cheap. You get a trusted third party to Audit you and publish the result of their Audit, something similar to a SAS70. It's not a perfect solution but i…
-
comment
Comment #12865779
The bear is more a favourite animal of the author
-
comment
Comment #12259991
Gotta say I disagree with this. I'd say what it means Is recognize that DNS security is important and treat it as such. The reason I disagree is that if you use something like gmai…
-
comment
Comment #11855315
Yeah go look on security stackexchange and you'll see it quite a bit, people just cargo cult the idea of obscurity == bad and don't consider the points made in OP's article
-
comment
Comment #11224536
Actually you are , AFAIK, incorrect there. Microsoft's consent decree from their antitrust trial expired in 2011/2012.
-
comment
Comment #11224524
It's never a good sign for your argument when you have to resort to ad hominem attacks.... No real point I trying to respond if that's your track but remember this is just a discus…
-
comment
Comment #11224292
Of course I can as it was my personal experience. On the other hand you made a general assertion about their actions which really needs a citation. Reinstalling an os is a technica…
-
comment
Comment #11224270
So a company who doesn't have a monopoly should be restricted from changing their product because it didn't use to be that way.... Seems a bit harsh to me... if Microsoft still occ…
-
comment
Comment #11224130
So your pc or fedora has a bug which prevents you changing os and it then follows that Microsoft have a monopoly power in PCs... Sorry I don't quite think that follows
-
comment
Comment #11224115
I have bought and installed linux on laptops from hp and Lenovo with no problems at all. Also you can buy laptops from Dell with linux pre-installed. Can you provide any citations …
-
comment
Comment #11223777
But surely they're not closing off the pc platform, just potentially restricting what can happen on their OS. You can still use PCs with linux without any lock in. Long gone are th…
-
comment
Comment #11100307
Pentester: I'll use mass scan, someone else already solved this problem. https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan
-
comment
Comment #11061355
My understanding is that most people would suggest that that only applies to the head of state (currently queen Elizabeth) But Prince Charles isn't the head of state... So assuming…
-
comment
Comment #10666640
You don't think those protections should be in place for the 99% of users of these devices who have no idea what a firmware is, let alone would want to update them?
-
comment
Comment #9829459
Its a shame to see the company react like this, but the author is taking a bit of a risk here. Finding sql injection requires active testing of the site which, without authority to…
-
comment
Comment #7201180
The wiki is not uneditable. You should be able to create an account, then you can edit pretty much any page on the site..