Viewing profile — r-zip
r-zip
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 01, 2019, 2:15 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 184
- Public activity
- 105 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About r-zip
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #42648219
How stupid do these CEOs think people are?
-
comment
Comment #42479618
They’re not wrong though. The frequency with which these things still just make shit up is astonishingly bad. Very dismissive of a legitimate criticism.
-
comment
Comment #42479573
Unwillingness to adapt to the destruction of the middle class and knowledge work is pretty reasonable tbh.
-
comment
Comment #42194419
What mathematical guarantees? I don't see any mathematical results in the paper.
-
comment
Comment #41299307
They are NOT as unaware of things as we are. That’s like someone seeing a software developer googling stuff and saying “see, they don’t know much more than me”. An expert refreshin…
-
comment
Comment #40927900
> in no universe is that a legitimate ML interview question Why not? This seems like the ML equivalent of FizzBuzz. If you don't know how matrix multiplication works well enough to…
-
comment
Comment #40635993
But they likely did have their wives do a lot of the domestic heavy lifting.
-
comment
Comment #38525779
Damn, really?
-
comment
Comment #38447211
I think the time estimates depend heavily on the field. A mathematician recently told him that it would take him 1-2 weeks (with nothing else to do in that time) to digest a paper …
-
comment
Comment #37380899
Did you read the abstract?
-
comment
Comment #37380672
What are you talking about? Did we read the same abstract?
-
comment
Comment #37238043
Even with an accuracy score, it’s meaningless. Accuracy isn’t the right metric.
-
comment
Comment #36590202
This was also a problem a decade ago. I asked a professor for research opportunities and ended up segmenting a bunch of images. That was it. No credit for that work, either (or pay…
-
comment
Comment #35798111
Self-supervised training doesn’t involve human labelers, and that’s what’s responsible for most of the recent gains in LLM performance.
-
comment
Comment #35706241
Deep nets are notoriously overconfident in their predictions. So why do you expect this approach to succeed?
-
comment
Comment #35588432
Would you say the same about golf?
-
comment
Comment #35534366
There is an Apple Pay option. I just used it!
-
comment
Comment #34441632
Wouldn't ">=" be "not <"?
-
comment
Comment #34312704
You’re joking, right?
-
comment
Comment #34312137
If you seriously don’t think this will be widely abused, then you’re extremely optimistic. Spreading propaganda is the most obvious use case, assuming the resource requirement rema…
-
comment
Comment #34312088
Serious question: do the people who work on this topic think they’re doing a good thing?
-
comment
Comment #34035160
I guess that depends on your definition of “world.” For me, that would be a planet, not a moon.
- comment