Viewing profile — r-bryan
r-bryan
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 16, 2010, 1:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 152
- Public activity
- 49 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About r-bryan
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48318173
Why does a carpenter cut the end off a 10-foot board to get a required 9ft-2in, thereby wasting 8% of the input and incurring dumpster charges? Suppose the architect's design speci…
-
comment
Comment #45154830
Check out this 156-page tome: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13478 : "Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gauges" The intro says that it "...serves a dual pu…
-
comment
Comment #44349057
Methinks Zawinski's Law of Software Envelopment finds some empirical support here.
-
comment
Comment #44306848
Oh FFS why is print-vs-debug being debated as either/or? Both can be valuable, depending on the circumstances. It's clearly both/and.
-
comment
Comment #42693314
Well dang, we are not restricted to git as the only place we can put historical metadata. You know, discursive comments, for starters?
-
comment
Comment #42693086
I once worked with a company that provided IM services to hyper competitive, testosterone poisoned options traders. On the first fine trading day of a January new year, our IM prov…
-
comment
Comment #42604917
Yeah, basically the oil companies pumping up fossil fuel to burn, but we get a single use of it as plastic before it goes to the incinerator.
-
comment
Comment #42131204
A little stoichometry suggests that, ignoring oxygen, hydrogen, and energy input, the cited worldwide market for C2H4 would be satisfied by just about 1 gigaton of CO2. So if "we n…
-
comment
Comment #41925655
Earth escape velocity is 11.1 km/s, which is Mach 32 at sea level. They have some more engineering to do, maybe even invent something better than carbon fibers.
-
comment
Comment #41666302
"Always be yourself. Everyone else is already taken."
-
comment
Comment #39365830
OK, but I'd rather prevent/cure the dementia.
-
comment
Comment #35352310
I can highly recommend Epsilon (emacs-like) from lugaru.com.
-
comment
Comment #34357000
Be an engineering mentor for your local high school robotics club. From personal experience, I can guarantee that you will come upon aspects of engineering where you are a rank new…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #31346478
There is an unfortunate fallacy here. Your notion "the real world" conflates the physical world with a social milieu. The physical world is (at this scale) immutable, so of course …
-
comment
Comment #29785540
This scenario is very reminiscent of the leadup to the Innovator's Dilemma. The dinosaurs grow taller and fatter seeking and thriving on the juicy foliage higher up the tree, while…
-
comment
Comment #29523563
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #29371731
I dunno. Don't we have yet to resolve where the curly braces belong, or emacs vs vi, or mac vs pc, or red sox vs yankees, or at least what materials to use for the staff bikeshed?
-
comment
Comment #28939657
The author missed Symbolics Document Examiner and its partner, Concordia, dating from around 1985. Disclaimer: I led the implementation team.
-
comment
Comment #28621064
As Carl Sagan might have said, "To build a platform from scratch, you must first create the universe."
-
comment
Comment #28372579
I don't see why zero-growth has to be zero-sum. If not all the "labor" inputs are eaten up by society-wide subsistence, some value will continue to accumulate, somewhere. To the de…
-
comment
Comment #26084087
The book _Writing on Both Sides of the Brain_ (Henriette Klauser) got me unstuck. Ignoring the left-brain/right-brain stuff, imagine that you have a creative, let it fly part and a…
-
comment
Comment #25377150
Cool. Now solve it for a circular fence on the surface of a sphere. In fact, solve all four cases {exterior, interior of sphere} X {exterior, interior of fence}. Spherical trig can…
-
comment
Comment #25182956
Maybe it was ObjectStore (read about it on Wikipedia). Pretty clever, I thought.
-
comment
Comment #25165651
That PDF document was produced by some historical interviewers, not Symbolics. Your comment roundly criticizes Symbolics for someone else's work. Only in the words it contains does…