Viewing profile — qwytw
qwytw
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 7:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,212
- Public activity
- 1,670 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qwytw
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49188171
> over and refusing to acknowledge it. I guess one option would be to vote with your walled and stop paying them? Oh.. wait.. Whatever Oracle is in general this specifically (and t…
-
comment
Comment #49187765
There is. Specifically the pricing for open models from third party providers on OpenRouter since inference is a "commodity" at this point. Unless we think that Opus/GPT-5.6 are ma…
-
comment
Comment #49174271
That's what you should ask the companies spending massive amounts of money on AI though?
-
comment
Comment #49174226
There is no evidence they are losing money on inference, though? Also if they are keeping the price low because they want to gain market share and reduce the competitiveness of Chi…
-
comment
Comment #49174146
They claimed that OpenAI and Anthropic have positive gross margins. I don't think there are many credible claims saying that's not the case (at least for API usage)?
-
comment
Comment #49089136
Cost of labor is based on supply and demand not the value created. If there were more engineers capable of creating those JS frameworks than there was demand for they'd get paid wa…
-
comment
Comment #49089072
Switzerland was already the second richest country in Europe in 1913 despite not having a colonial empire to exploit, ample raw resources or the best geographic location.
-
comment
Comment #49088937
> So? Imagine you build a house and it only increases in value after you sold it? How is this relevant? We are not talking about the author selling the copyright of their work and …
-
comment
Comment #49088814
> seemingly moral justifications of an empirically immoral practice How is it empirically immoral? Historically it was one of the best things to have have happened to creative prof…
-
comment
Comment #49075165
Because the judge ruled that using the books for training was "fair use". The issue was Anthropic downloading and storing pirated content and there is quite a bit of precedent rega…
-
comment
Comment #49075136
It would also make it much easier for corporations to exploit authors. They would generally make most of their money early (in the couple of years following when the content is rel…
-
comment
Comment #49075051
Well no, but I'm a human and not a commercial computer program so it's not particularly relevant. I'm would not be making loads of money making those citations either but that's on…
-
comment
Comment #49073359
It's up to the congressman to weight all evidence and data available and come to well informed conclusion. If they are incapable or unwilling to do that that's a different issue. >…
-
comment
Comment #49073322
Funding their reelection, industry "connections" making it easy for you or your relatives to get jobs or make profitable investments, opportunities to get speaking fees after you l…
-
comment
Comment #49073293
Well a funding a PAC that supports a specific candidate/party who gets elected because of that effectively accomplishes the same thing. Of course the salary the company "buys" for …
-
comment
Comment #49072942
Money is relative, though. I guess the question is if it's acceptable to charge a tiny symbolic fee for that cup of water if the other person's pockets are visibly overflowing with…
-
comment
Comment #49072871
You can also buy a book produce a large number of copies after jumbling around some chapters sell it to other people. That's illegal to do if you are person but not if you an AI co…
-
comment
Comment #49072826
> the marginal value that the next buyer would buy Well the argument is that they should pay for the right to produce derivative works not for the physical copy.
-
comment
Comment #49072759
It was about piracy, though? Not fair use.
-
comment
Comment #49072731
For corporations sure. For individual authors that's certainly not fair. Especially since it makes it easier for corporations to exploit their work without paying them anything. > …
-
comment
Comment #49072710
Well imagine you write a book in your 20s or 30s and it only becomes popular after a couple of decades. The publisher gets to pocket all the money. Somebody decides to make a movie…
-
comment
Comment #48896591
> Arguably they should have just gone with Android, It's not obvious Nokia could have realistically competed with the East Asian phone manufacturers for more than a few years. It w…
-
comment
Comment #48883346
Well it might be reasonably easy to get your non-GAAP earnings positive if you fiddle with the numbers enough.
-
comment
Comment #48883316
It's not like it's realistically possible they are directly losing money on their API inference (subscriptions are maybe less clear but I think it wouldn't be far fetched to think …
-
comment
Comment #48566177
Will it be? It's so obscenely slow and expensive and its not obvious it could provide a lot of value for non highly specialized tasks.