Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — qwertylicious

qwertylicious

HN member
Joined
Thu, May 01, 2025, 5:00 PM UTC
HN karma
86
Public activity
25 items

About qwertylicious

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45939121

    I mean, yeah? That's why in my workflow I don't write single monster specs. Rather, I work with the LLM to iterate on small, individual, highly constrained specs that provide usefu…

  2. comment
    Comment #45015993

    As a homeowner I literally pay a fee every month to fund the construction and maintenance of the infrastructure that gets water to my home. If that water supply is cut off without …

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #44902404

    Yup, fair. I tried to acknowledge that in my paragraph about KYC in a follow-up edit to one of my earlier comments, but I agree, the language I've been using has been intentionally…

  5. comment
    Comment #44901752

    So let's consider the possibilities: #1. Facebook did everything they could to evaluate Flo as a company and the data they were receiving, but they simply had no way to tell that t…

  6. comment
    Comment #44901545

    That's not my problem to solve? If Facebook chooses to build a system that can ingest massive amounts of third party data, and cannot simultaneously develop a system to vet that da…

  7. comment
    Comment #44901400

    Yeah, sorry, no, I have to disagree. We're seeing this broad trend in tech where we just want to shrug and say "gee wiz, the machine did it all on its own, who could've guessed tha…

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #44900723

    It's also called "liability". "Warning, this washing machine might burn your house down" is not sufficient to escape punishment. Why should digital technology get a pass just becau…

  10. comment
    Comment #44900660

    Sure, when applied thoughtfully and judiciously. Look back. At no point did I suggest AI should be banned or outlawed. My remedy for washing machines burning down houses isn't to b…

  11. comment
    Comment #44888329

    I have nothing to add other than to say this is, IMO, exactly right. I have no notes.

  12. comment
    Comment #44888254

    Or sweatshops or radium infused tinctures. We've moved on from the 1800s. Why are you using that as your baseline of expectation?

  13. comment
    Comment #44888146

    This is the story of the modern tech industry at large: a major new technology is released, harms are caused, but because of industry norms and a favourable legal environment, comp…

  14. comment
    Comment #44838366

    > It's a logical presumption. Researchers discover things. AGI is a researcher that can be scaled, research faster, and requires no downtime. Those observations only lead to scalin…

  15. comment
    Comment #44838343

    > Progress has been exponential in the generic. Has it? Really? Consider theoretical physics, which hasn't significantly advancement since the advent of general relativity and quan…

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #44837612

    The parent is referring to the "buy, borrow, die" strategy of wealth accumulation. Would that work in your parent's specific circumstance? Maybe? Maybe not? But taking a low intere…

  18. comment
    Comment #44837562

    > There are many ways to make consumption taxes not regressive. You can implement refunds up to certain threshold. You can use the revenue to fund services used by lower income fam…

  19. comment
    Comment #44837422

    > And given we lack the technical ability to fully understand global warming I'm sorry, what? We have total understanding of global warming: 1) CO2 traps heat, we know that from ba…

  20. comment
    Comment #44746896

    Yeah, LLMs share a lot of the same challenges as self-driving cars: when they work great, we get complacent, and then when they fail, they fail in ways that humans are really bad a…

  21. comment
    Comment #44563828

    > Conservative ideology views government research as inefficient compared to private sector research, something I generally agree with. I'd agree that's generally true when a profi…

  22. comment
    Comment #44563704

    It says a lot about the current discourse around AI that 6 years ago Marcus would write: > Despite all of the problems I have sketched, I don’t think that we need to abandon deep l…

  23. comment
  24. comment
  25. comment