Viewing profile — qwertylicious
qwertylicious
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 01, 2025, 5:00 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 86
- Public activity
- 25 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qwertylicious
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45939121
I mean, yeah? That's why in my workflow I don't write single monster specs. Rather, I work with the LLM to iterate on small, individual, highly constrained specs that provide usefu…
-
comment
Comment #45015993
As a homeowner I literally pay a fee every month to fund the construction and maintenance of the infrastructure that gets water to my home. If that water supply is cut off without …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #44902404
Yup, fair. I tried to acknowledge that in my paragraph about KYC in a follow-up edit to one of my earlier comments, but I agree, the language I've been using has been intentionally…
-
comment
Comment #44901752
So let's consider the possibilities: #1. Facebook did everything they could to evaluate Flo as a company and the data they were receiving, but they simply had no way to tell that t…
-
comment
Comment #44901545
That's not my problem to solve? If Facebook chooses to build a system that can ingest massive amounts of third party data, and cannot simultaneously develop a system to vet that da…
-
comment
Comment #44901400
Yeah, sorry, no, I have to disagree. We're seeing this broad trend in tech where we just want to shrug and say "gee wiz, the machine did it all on its own, who could've guessed tha…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #44900723
It's also called "liability". "Warning, this washing machine might burn your house down" is not sufficient to escape punishment. Why should digital technology get a pass just becau…
-
comment
Comment #44900660
Sure, when applied thoughtfully and judiciously. Look back. At no point did I suggest AI should be banned or outlawed. My remedy for washing machines burning down houses isn't to b…
-
comment
Comment #44888329
I have nothing to add other than to say this is, IMO, exactly right. I have no notes.
-
comment
Comment #44888254
Or sweatshops or radium infused tinctures. We've moved on from the 1800s. Why are you using that as your baseline of expectation?
-
comment
Comment #44888146
This is the story of the modern tech industry at large: a major new technology is released, harms are caused, but because of industry norms and a favourable legal environment, comp…
-
comment
Comment #44838366
> It's a logical presumption. Researchers discover things. AGI is a researcher that can be scaled, research faster, and requires no downtime. Those observations only lead to scalin…
-
comment
Comment #44838343
> Progress has been exponential in the generic. Has it? Really? Consider theoretical physics, which hasn't significantly advancement since the advent of general relativity and quan…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #44837612
The parent is referring to the "buy, borrow, die" strategy of wealth accumulation. Would that work in your parent's specific circumstance? Maybe? Maybe not? But taking a low intere…
-
comment
Comment #44837562
> There are many ways to make consumption taxes not regressive. You can implement refunds up to certain threshold. You can use the revenue to fund services used by lower income fam…
-
comment
Comment #44837422
> And given we lack the technical ability to fully understand global warming I'm sorry, what? We have total understanding of global warming: 1) CO2 traps heat, we know that from ba…
-
comment
Comment #44746896
Yeah, LLMs share a lot of the same challenges as self-driving cars: when they work great, we get complacent, and then when they fail, they fail in ways that humans are really bad a…
-
comment
Comment #44563828
> Conservative ideology views government research as inefficient compared to private sector research, something I generally agree with. I'd agree that's generally true when a profi…
-
comment
Comment #44563704
It says a lot about the current discourse around AI that 6 years ago Marcus would write: > Despite all of the problems I have sketched, I don’t think that we need to abandon deep l…
-
comment
Comment #43860868
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #43860666
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #43860500
[dead]