Viewing profile — qwerty12345678
qwerty12345678
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jan 17, 2021, 2:49 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -42
- Public activity
- 25 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qwerty12345678
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25975277
I didn't see it mention they were physically blocking anyone. It says they assembled at the entrance.
-
comment
Comment #25975258
It doesn't say they were "blocking" the entrance, it says they gathered at the entrance holding signs. Let's be fair, as long as they were peaceful, they were perfectly within thei…
-
comment
Comment #25946379
BS they closed their shorts....they shifted them to shell companies or to complicit 3rd parties so they could claim they unloaded the shorts publicly.
-
comment
Comment #25946298
I don't know if any of Wall St realizes it yet, but this is bigger than dollars and cents. It was the biggest news story in the world, and they made the decision to rub their power…
-
comment
Comment #25913361
> There's an election process with many layers of oversight, that's the 'proof'. In what world do you live in where this statement constitutes as proof . > Just because there are w…
-
comment
Comment #25913320
If the alleged fraud did take place (and I'm not sure if it did or didn't), it was likely only a handful of string-pullers and lots of useful-idiots. There was so much emotion in t…
-
comment
Comment #25913242
I replied to this on multiple other comments in this thread. (they may be flagged or dead so may not be visible unless you have your settings set to show dead) "Innocent until prov…
-
comment
Comment #25912971
See my flagged comment below beginning with "The general consensus is that this was a dynamic hack". That explains why hand-recounting of ballots wouldn't make a difference. Also, …
-
comment
Comment #25912909
I forgot to touch on this in my reply...If what I mentioned in my reply did in fact occur, you now understand why "recounts" wouldn't make any difference.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25912699
"Innocence until proven guilty" is relating to an individual being formally accused of a crime in a court of law. We are talking about a PUBLIC PROCESS, which in my opinion doesn't…
-
comment
Comment #25912335
Here's the forensic report from Allied Security Operations Group. Michigan politicians did everything in their power to keep this hidden, but a judge ultimately released it. This s…
-
comment
Comment #25912038
Thanks, I'll review. The last "refute" I read in response to the technical report from Allied Security Operations Group[1] was ridiculous and contained no debunking evidence, so I …
-
comment
Comment #25911949
Since you bring up technical backgrounds, how do you feel about the voting machines having logs erased for 2020 but not 2016? And would you be against analyzing all election machin…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #25911717
You're referring to Hitchens's Razor, which I believe is a flawed mindset that's used selectively as it suits people. The situation here is that the proof is very well hidden, and …
-
comment
Comment #25911478
Debating with the left on this is like debating with a brick wall. You try to have a logical conversation about the basic security aspects involved here and they respond by calling…
-
comment
Comment #25911407
Between server logs disappearing, servers themselves disappearing, USB devices being plugged into voting machines throughout election night, voting machines being connected to the …
-
comment
Comment #25911368
Serious Question: Why is everyone assuming they're lying? And why doesn't anyone want to prove Biden won? From my perspective, the accusations he made were completely dodged by Dom…
-
comment
Comment #25815697
Please provide references that she was in fact "telling the truth".
-
comment
Comment #25812433
So in other words, that's what you want to believe, so you will believe it without any actual facts. Ignorant people like you worsen the division in America.
-
comment
Comment #25811496
Technically, it IS violating free speech when anything is censored. That doesn't mean that particular speech is condoned. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that, you ju…
-
comment
Comment #25811413
So if your private water utility company decides to cut off your water access because they don't agree with your politics, would you say "welp, they're a private company and they c…
-
comment
Comment #25811303
Exactly. And Apple is in bed with the government. And many of us carry around Apple branded microphones (or telescreens I should say?) in our pocket. And Apple allows indirect gove…
-
comment
Comment #25811233
This is absurd and infuriating that people are sheepishly agreeing with a mega-corporation as they literally attempt to change the definition of something in front of our eyes. Has…