Viewing profile — qwer
qwer
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Dec 12, 2007, 2:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 102
- Public activity
- 65 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qwer
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19025864
It's in the blog post, but more were created by the transition than removed. There were less than 10 issues found and none were anything that users were concerned about.
-
comment
Comment #19003371
I just finished something similar: http://caines.ca/blog/2018/12/11/a-javascript-to-typescript-... We opted to keep it strict (no implicit `any`) through the entire transition but …
-
comment
Comment #19003138
Sure... I guess you're saying that you can use the typescript compiler just fine as long as you turn off literally the only reason for it? Have you been on a team that adequately m…
-
comment
Comment #19003013
> I'm confused how people can advocate TDD and not like static types too seeing as static typing gives you robust automated tests for the minimal cost of adding type annotations ev…
-
comment
Comment #19002925
I don't know where this misconception started, but you can't just run javascript through a typescript compiler. There is a huge amount of valid javascript that is not valid typescr…
- story
-
comment
Comment #18317407
Well let me first remind you that you're in a javascript thread. OO Pascal is strict enough that you're not going to get the opportunity to see things work when they get types that…
-
comment
Comment #18317370
> If your types are wrong your program is wrong That's not necessarily true though is it? If the "1" in the "1 hour ago" message in the header of your reply wasn't the expected typ…
-
comment
Comment #18316322
This sounds like an if-it-compiles-it-works argument.
-
comment
Comment #18316311
Well don't lose sight of the goal. The goal is less bugs. Static typing is just for internal quality. Users don't give a rat's ass if your types are correct as long as the program …
-
comment
Comment #17306835
Clearly... but then again I won't work at a place with any developers less than 11x.
-
comment
Comment #17305506
Sounds like you didn't read the article.
-
comment
Comment #17305471
> the easily observed phenomenon that some developers are 10x more productive than other developers. How are you measuring? LOC? Semi-colons per hour? story points? If you're measu…
-
comment
Comment #17196702
I wouldn't have noticed if it hadn't been pointed out but it's definitely a term for a pretty outdated female-only position so I think the point isn't so extreme. I can almost neve…
-
comment
Comment #16952129
Just slowly go to bed earlier every day. Set your alarm for your go-to-bed time. Read a book if you can't sleep, but not on a bright-screened device. I used to be such a nighthawk …
-
comment
Comment #15885577
In that scenario I bet they're even more effective without the condescending "manager" adding nothing.
-
comment
Comment #14839694
I know this goes against the usual attitude about remote work around here but... That flow-chart at the bottom is hilariously true. I've been a part of remote work as both a manage…
-
comment
Comment #14778890
I think it's more nuanced than that and one can consistently hold both viewpoints at the same time. You just need to have the experience that a soa-first approach is even worse tha…
-
comment
Comment #14662770
It's because this is an article about engineering decision-making, not repo management.
-
comment
Comment #14662712
I think you really did oversimplify it. Writing a piece of code once obviously affects your speed at writing it again.
-
comment
Comment #14446422
I was a CS TA 20 years ago and it was the same. Literally everyone was doing it to some degree. Back then you would hand in printed source code. People would occasionally photocopy…
-
comment
Comment #14341325
I find physical exercise gets me back out even easier than napping. It took me a while to figure that out, but it's been really helpful.
-
comment
Comment #14073923
Relatively few, but they're everywhere -- Auto-pilot on airplanes. ABS brakes. Self-driving cars. "Releasing early", in the sense of getting these things into the real world as ear…
-
comment
Comment #13927341
Come on... The article is clearly written for a general web dev audience (if not, please let me know the more specific audience you've inferred) and starts with this completely unq…
-
comment
Comment #13926916
This is just another article telling me about what I should do with my web application without asking me anything whatsoever about my web application. Just because you made a bad c…