Viewing profile — queoahfh
queoahfh
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 09, 2026, 7:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 7
- Public activity
- 6 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About queoahfh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48843884
I wrongly guessed that the boolean in the original C code was for error handling when I skimmed it, but instead it is just a result value, while elog() and related macros/functions…
-
comment
Comment #48842707
Yes, but the original boolean seems to have been used for error handling, and the tagged union is also used for error handling. Why have both simultaneously in the same function in…
-
comment
Comment #48842529
I am concerned about the quality. Even a cursory skim of the code makes the code appear asinine. Unless the genius aspects of the code elude me. https://github.com/malisper/pgrust/…
-
comment
Comment #48842518
From what I skimmed manually, not that many, but the code itself seems labyrinthical. Like, why have both Rust Try-supporting Error-like tagged union, but also booleans, for error …
-
comment
Comment #48842481
What a peculiar kind of rewrite. Rust: https://github.com/malisper/pgrust/blob/3646a73515a5e4ac7d0b... Original: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/df293aed46e3133df3... Usa…
-
comment
Comment #48842266
Didn't the initial rewrite of Bun into Rust have an ocean of "unsafe" in it, and wasn't it entirely dysfunctional?