Viewing profile — quasigloam
quasigloam
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Aug 11, 2024, 1:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 167
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About quasigloam
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48966154
Presumably it gives the JIT more type information, parent example was specifically about one of the type-check functions you can use for guards (is_float). While running it'll use …
-
comment
Comment #48641248
(Self plug) There’s also a lisp in the decl macro system directly: https://github.com/RyanWelly/lisp-in-rs-macros
- story
-
comment
Comment #48199135
Twitter doesn’t show replies when you’re not logged in. https://xcancel.com/antigravity/status/2056795168326754759
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #48046033
Now I’m curious; what book of grammar was it? What did the exercises look like? What other languages and strategies did you use?
- story
-
comment
Comment #46891983
What would you say some of these pros and cons would be? I don’t think anyone really speaks about the possible negatives of having strong mental imagery would be
-
comment
Comment #46268431
I really enjoy tiled words, thanks for making this new addition to my daily routine!
-
comment
Comment #44281785
At some point there was "the keyboard extension" which was somewhat vim like (kinda). It was too overpowered and you literally could not flag someone who was using it in ultra or h…
-
comment
Comment #44281760
I usually play chess with just my mousepad, so I've basically always just dragged and dropped. Playing click and click feels about the same speed, but I'm less used to it; maybe I'…
-
comment
Comment #41537990
Although in a Lisp such as Scheme, you could pass around the negation operator in something like (map - '(1 2 3)), so it would be a valid concern that it might clash.
-
comment
Comment #41537979
No problem! I had fun making it, for such a silly little project it's given me a surprising amount of joy. If you want to look at another cool project that's tangentially related, …
-
comment
Comment #41537781
Implementing a lisp in the type system would be fun, that's originally what this project was about until I got distracted with macros. Awesome projects like fortraith ( https://git…
-
comment
Comment #41537279
Yes it would match both, this would require us to assume that "foo - bar" can only be an atom. It's not a great solution.
-
comment
Comment #41536810
Yes, at the moment I just assume that all atoms are rust idents because that makes it easier to implement (I can just match against $x:ident), so it doesn't support dashes in atoms…
-
comment
Comment #41535812
Thanks! It was fun to make. It was also instructive, as I learned that rust analyser doesn't handle macros generating millions of tokens :D
- comment
- story