Viewing profile — quantummagic
quantummagic
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 24, 2025, 6:01 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 847
- Public activity
- 389 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About quantummagic
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49227513
The point is that to the extent it causes certain individuals to lose faith in humanity, or become reclusive, and as a result not reproduce -- it has the effect of altering the ove…
-
comment
Comment #49135242
Does it take a human to have agency? Doesn't a cat have agency and desire? What about a worm? Where do you make the cut off, and why? If an AI is programmed with a bias towards cre…
-
comment
Comment #49135189
> For example, I recently spent 2 weeks researching Bruce Lee ... [AI] output will just be a reiteration of already common knowledge instead of the actual efforts I made researchin…
-
comment
Comment #49035294
It sounds like people ruined them for you — it isn't AI calling you out for using them.
-
comment
Comment #49035180
I'm no fan of the current administration, but this particular loss seems to be a failing of military strategy and leadership, not civilian ineptitude. It's not like the Whitehouse …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49035018
Seriously. The only way to use it is to be a very religious person. You have to pray every single time you use it that your system doesn't become compromised.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48964741
It could just be streaming the trailer.
-
comment
Comment #48962538
I'm not missing it at all. Whatever the damn price is (of course it fluctuates) the only way you can make a bet that the price will go down further, is if someone else thinks it's …
- story
-
comment
Comment #48947481
There is pleasure in completing things. In actually producing something, and moving on to the next thing. It isn't enjoyable to have paralysis by analysis... too afraid to take the…
-
comment
Comment #48946559
Pragmatically speaking, a half-assed answer now, is often better than a perfect answer tomorrow.
-
comment
Comment #48945317
> What you're essentially saying is that "every gallon of milk is sold to a person". This is not useful information. Only because you're ignoring the other option, that the gallon …
-
comment
Comment #48945228
> And every (short) sale is proof that the market thinks it's a bad investment at that price, which logically nullifies your point. No it doesn't. It's the flip side of the one you…
-
comment
Comment #48941711
No, you're just working very hard to miss the point. Nobody can place the pessimistic bet, unless there is someone equally optimistic in the other direction. The fact that you're f…
-
comment
Comment #48939980
People respond to market forces. When they see that there are other people making irrational valuations, they may wait to buy even lower. It's not a judgment about the intrinsic va…
-
comment
Comment #48939312
Yes, stocks go up and down; hardly revelatory. The point, regardless of the imprecise wording of my alternate title, remains. There are people who think they are getting a valuable…
-
comment
Comment #48939123
I never intended to imply that the law of supply and demand was nullified. And I didn't say that the price was unaffected, just that there is as much money thinking they're getting…
-
comment
Comment #48938832
It has nothing to do with the shares being borrowed. That's a separate transaction that comes with a fee. The point is that the share is then sold. It's sold to someone who is taki…
-
comment
Comment #48938785
You're absolutely correct, and I should have been more precise. The value is always identical, but the number of participants, need not be the same for each position. Mea culpa.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48938587
That's exactly the point. The clickbait title wants you to forget that fact and draw an incorrect conclusion. It could have also been, "SPCX is the most purchased new stock", but t…
-
comment
Comment #48938540
Regardless, you can't short anything without someone taking the opposite position. It's really independent of the overall downward trend.
-
comment
Comment #48938353
They're illegal, and you can look at them just as the broker making a long bet themselves. Since they'll have to pay off the short seller, if the stock goes down.