Viewing profile — quantumHazer
quantumHazer
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 27, 2025, 6:19 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 287
- Public activity
- 96 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About quantumHazer
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48889936
> Fable didn't even need to debug it; I believe essentially all the assembly worked correctly on the first try. so you don't know if it works properly or not
-
comment
Comment #48863948
Probably llm slop
-
comment
Comment #48773249
> There are many ways to build for the web, both with and without AI. If AI is a part of your workflow, we think this tool will help make it even more productive. And if it isn’t, …
-
comment
Comment #47805779
also, there is multiple models called codex or that have codex as a "suffix" eg. "gpt-5.3-codex"
-
comment
Comment #47476231
you can’t iterate fast over quality though. it takes patience and expertise, not a bloated repo like this. every example you mentioned is not something you should delegate to LLMs,…
-
comment
Comment #47470130
> not using GenAI could mean project won't be competitive in current landscape why? this is false in my opinion, iterating fast is not a good indicator of quality nor competitivene…
-
comment
Comment #47120532
the author is an employee of Cursor/Anysphere. i think this should've been declared at the start of the article. it's always like this.
-
comment
Comment #46959700
Not unpopular at all. I think it's one of the best Ferrari ever made.
-
comment
Comment #46861999
Or maybe, hear me out, we don't need any of this ""agent"" first shiny thingy
-
comment
Comment #46267214
I wouldn’t be surprised if this is undisclosed PR from Anthropic
-
comment
Comment #46267132
Why are we commenting the Claude subreddit? 1) it’s not impartial 2) it’s useless hype commentary 3) it’s literally astroturfing at this point
-
comment
Comment #46235126
Seems pretty false if you look at the model card and web site of Opus 4.5 that is… (check notes) their latest model.
-
comment
Comment #46095757
> it won’t make sense to learn how to code. Sure. So we can keep paying money to your employer, Anthropic, right?
-
comment
Comment #46040618
Last year’s model were at 50-60% on SWE bench-verified actually
-
comment
Comment #45751180
there is also Normal Computing[0] that are trying different approaches to chips like that. Anyway these are very difficult problems and Extropic already abandoned some of their ini…
-
comment
Comment #45750496
there is also Normal Computing[0] that are trying different approaches to chips like that. [0]: https://www.normalcomputing.com
-
comment
Comment #45750472
yess, but: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.10728
-
comment
Comment #45437437
> dev bootcamp i will not comment any further
-
comment
Comment #45429253
> just admit it, interns are struggling competing with Claude Code, Cursor and Codex They are not. This is false, zirp ended, this is the problem. Not LLMs.
-
comment
Comment #45293776
Upload your pdf so we can gather more training data but you’re providing it!
-
comment
Comment #45029394
Both of you are wrong and this is not good discussion level for HN
-
comment
Comment #45008017
This comments shows that most of the users in this thread have not done game development. We are judging the usefulness of a LLM in a project that is really over represented in tra…
-
comment
Comment #44916652
this is false and the two things are not correlated. if you followed news during the GAN cycle you could extrapolate that deep NN could do this type of things. it is really cool th…
-
comment
Comment #44902862
It is also true that models doesn't give a ** about instructions sometimes and the do whatever text predictions is more likely (even with reasoning)
-
comment
Comment #44902820
a 1 minutes research on the internet led me to discover that you are MARKETING MANAGER at amazon. so your take is full of conflict of interest and this should be disclosed.