Viewing profile — qt31415926
qt31415926
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Dec 01, 2013, 7:25 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 77
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qt31415926
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48593265
Isn't that what's solved by this method? Your SSO provider (e.g. Okta) is now what gates each employee's resource access for different MCP resources.
-
comment
Comment #43723134
the commenter never said they came up with nothing, they said o3 came up with something better.
-
comment
Comment #42731502
On our apps we consistently see a p50 3-4x speed difference between iOS and Android (though there are more lower end android devices). Hard to fathom if it's all due to variability…
-
comment
Comment #42473839
Which parts of reasoning do you think is missing? I do feel like it covers a lot of 'reasoning' ground despite its on the surface simplicity
-
comment
Comment #42333025
> React doesn't make you a better developer, it makes you a better React developer. React's pure component functional style translates really well to nearly every other type of sof…
-
comment
Comment #41523271
808 ELO was for GPT-4o. I would suggest re-reading more carefully
-
comment
Comment #39225605
A lot of the internet would break if YouTube removed/tweaked their embedded video player so I doubt he has to worry.
-
comment
Comment #38342761
He's pointing out a motte/bailey meaning he's against the motte. If to him e/acc is the motte, then he's likely against
-
comment
Comment #38154390
It's actually impressive that Weird Al has made it as far as he did now that I think about it
-
comment
Comment #38100921
FYI, it was sarcasm (the emoji at the end is the giveaway)
-
comment
Comment #37573663
He groups them together because ultimately the result is that the science can't be trusted. He doesn't go so far to claim that one was intentionally faked vs gross incompetence.
-
comment
Comment #37573596
I don't think the statement reads that the 44% and the 26% should be additive. Especially given the zombie graphic where it looks like they overlap the 26 on top of the 44, where t…
-
comment
Comment #36852977
Thanks, didn't know. This article seems to have been written by a reader though so not the same authors of the sketchy lithium work
-
comment
Comment #36498912
I'm impressed you were able to not get tangled up by the youtube/captcha/color hex/roman numeral mess! The youtube one is what screwed me over and over out of all my attempts
-
comment
Comment #36498802
I don't think it's easy. Verification is much easier than generating correct solutions for this. Looking at the JS, these rules use RNG such that you can have an inconsistent or im…
-
comment
Comment #36134799
Hmm I looked into it, and looked at papers/pdfs in google scholar's advanced search with her as an author that mentioned LLMs or GPT in the past 3 years. Every single one was a cri…
-
comment
Comment #36127052
In her field doesn't mean that's what she researches, LLMs are loosely in her field but the methods are completely different. Computational linguistics != deep learning. Deep learn…
-
comment
Comment #36126749
Her field has also taken the largest hit from the success of LLMs and her research topics and her department are probably no longer prioritized by research grants. Given how many a…
-
comment
Comment #36126708
Current topic aside, I feel like that stochastic parrots paper aged really poorly in its criticisms of LLMs, and reading it felt like political propaganda with its exaggerated rhet…
-
comment
Comment #35158278
oh my bad, totally misread that
-
comment
Comment #35155243
It's trained on pre-2021 data. Looks like they tested on the most recent tests (i.e. 2022-2023) or practice exams. But yeah standardized tests are heavily weighed towards pattern m…
-
comment
Comment #35155146
Curious since it does well on the LSAT, SAT, GRE Verbal.
-
comment
Comment #35088725
For Vietnamese, ChatGPT has been much more effective for me. You can tell it very specific things to modify as well as give it additional context which you can't really do with Goo…
-
comment
Comment #16322570
makes sense, so they just looped that segment. thanks!
-
story
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but what is happening in the SpaceX livestream?
https://youtu.be/wbSwFU6tY1c?t=41m51s At 41:55 the cam switches to a few frames where the car is no longer in space and looks like it's in some building and then switches back to n…