Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — qsucvatz

qsucvatz

HN member
Joined
Mon, Sep 30, 2013, 4:50 PM UTC
HN karma
12
Public activity
27 items

About qsucvatz

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #16612300

    And chlorine in salt!/s

  3. comment
    Comment #16489384

    And support by the original developers of Bitcoin, for scaling by blocksize and exponential growth of computing, bandwidth, and storage.

  4. comment
    Comment #16215056

    Bitcoin Cash added new utility that SegWit lacked: 8 MB blocks, higher capacity, lower on-chain fees. That new utility is new value for Bitcoin holders. Another fork will add ZKP p…

  5. comment
    Comment #16163347

    Bitcoin can fork to change it's Difficulty Adjustment Algorithm.

  6. comment
    Comment #16163339

    Bitcoin can change it's divisibility any time.

  7. comment
    Comment #16163314

    That long term stability may be impossible with a central bank.

  8. comment
    Comment #16163283

    If mining is too difficult,the difficulty drops, until a single PC is finding every block on schedule. I'll mine, so that won't happen.

  9. comment
    Comment #16136529

    Sure thing. BCH scales as Bitcoin was supposed to. It is supported by the original Bitcoin developers. It's electronic cash, directly peer to peer, not hub and spoke like Lightning…

  10. comment
    Comment #16136505

    More know BCH is Bitcoin every day.

  11. comment
    Comment #16034336

    Because Bitcoin used to work, and now it doesn't. Bitcoin Cash scales appropriately.

  12. comment
    Comment #16027934

    0 fee txns don't cause high fees. They are dropped from the mempool as needed.

  13. comment
    Comment #16027918

    Fees are skyrocketing in Satoshi: what used to be 1 sat/Byte is now 1000 sat/Byte.

  14. comment
    Comment #16027916

    Median fee is a good metric, it avoids the over-paying txns and the miner-accelerated txns.

  15. comment
    Comment #16027908

    How does litening work if it takes a transaction to open and a transaction to close, and the median fees are increasing with time?

  16. comment
    Comment #16027902

    Bitcoin Cash is closer to the original Bitcoin implementation in code, philosophy, and community. Same thing that worked since 2009, until the blocks ran out of space.

  17. comment
    Comment #15911847

    Going to $0 is -Inf% loss.

  18. comment
    Comment #15883779

    It was announced at the depths of the financial crisis, October 2008, when cornerstone institutions were declaring bankrupcy every weekend. It was running by January. Equation Grou…

  19. comment
    Comment #15883768

    It's all hinged on SHA-256 and RIPEMD-160 being good cryptographic hashes, and ECC being a good digital signature. Crazy town.

  20. comment
    Comment #15883746

    The revolution isn't in building niche complications. Progress looks like tearing things down. Replacement with automatons. Direct transactions.

  21. comment
    Comment #15883710

    This form of proof of work, SHA-256, has a scramble shuffle of XORs that quantum computers aren't applicable to.

  22. comment
    Comment #15883414

    Proof of work must be impossible to cheat, and easy to verify. Can't make issuing money as easy as printing paper.

  23. comment
    Comment #15880276

    In the end, either one does or does not own the property. They choose when to buy and when to sell. From your perspective, isn't it a massive risk not to sell at this all time high…

  24. comment
    Comment #15812174

    How can we count votes of people who don't have the money for a single transaction fee? I thought Bitcoin was supposed to be better because it was the cheapest?

  25. comment
    Comment #15812146

    Bitcoin is Bitcoin Cash. We immediately restored the ability for Bitcoin to be adopted with low fees and fast confirmations by using 8 MB blocks. The median income for the world is…