Viewing profile — qsucvatz
qsucvatz
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Sep 30, 2013, 4:50 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 12
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qsucvatz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #16612300
And chlorine in salt!/s
-
comment
Comment #16489384
And support by the original developers of Bitcoin, for scaling by blocksize and exponential growth of computing, bandwidth, and storage.
-
comment
Comment #16215056
Bitcoin Cash added new utility that SegWit lacked: 8 MB blocks, higher capacity, lower on-chain fees. That new utility is new value for Bitcoin holders. Another fork will add ZKP p…
-
comment
Comment #16163347
Bitcoin can fork to change it's Difficulty Adjustment Algorithm.
-
comment
Comment #16163339
Bitcoin can change it's divisibility any time.
-
comment
Comment #16163314
That long term stability may be impossible with a central bank.
-
comment
Comment #16163283
If mining is too difficult,the difficulty drops, until a single PC is finding every block on schedule. I'll mine, so that won't happen.
-
comment
Comment #16136529
Sure thing. BCH scales as Bitcoin was supposed to. It is supported by the original Bitcoin developers. It's electronic cash, directly peer to peer, not hub and spoke like Lightning…
-
comment
Comment #16136505
More know BCH is Bitcoin every day.
-
comment
Comment #16034336
Because Bitcoin used to work, and now it doesn't. Bitcoin Cash scales appropriately.
-
comment
Comment #16027934
0 fee txns don't cause high fees. They are dropped from the mempool as needed.
-
comment
Comment #16027918
Fees are skyrocketing in Satoshi: what used to be 1 sat/Byte is now 1000 sat/Byte.
-
comment
Comment #16027916
Median fee is a good metric, it avoids the over-paying txns and the miner-accelerated txns.
-
comment
Comment #16027908
How does litening work if it takes a transaction to open and a transaction to close, and the median fees are increasing with time?
-
comment
Comment #16027902
Bitcoin Cash is closer to the original Bitcoin implementation in code, philosophy, and community. Same thing that worked since 2009, until the blocks ran out of space.
-
comment
Comment #15911847
Going to $0 is -Inf% loss.
-
comment
Comment #15883779
It was announced at the depths of the financial crisis, October 2008, when cornerstone institutions were declaring bankrupcy every weekend. It was running by January. Equation Grou…
-
comment
Comment #15883768
It's all hinged on SHA-256 and RIPEMD-160 being good cryptographic hashes, and ECC being a good digital signature. Crazy town.
-
comment
Comment #15883746
The revolution isn't in building niche complications. Progress looks like tearing things down. Replacement with automatons. Direct transactions.
-
comment
Comment #15883710
This form of proof of work, SHA-256, has a scramble shuffle of XORs that quantum computers aren't applicable to.
-
comment
Comment #15883414
Proof of work must be impossible to cheat, and easy to verify. Can't make issuing money as easy as printing paper.
-
comment
Comment #15880276
In the end, either one does or does not own the property. They choose when to buy and when to sell. From your perspective, isn't it a massive risk not to sell at this all time high…
-
comment
Comment #15812174
How can we count votes of people who don't have the money for a single transaction fee? I thought Bitcoin was supposed to be better because it was the cheapest?
-
comment
Comment #15812146
Bitcoin is Bitcoin Cash. We immediately restored the ability for Bitcoin to be adopted with low fees and fast confirmations by using 8 MB blocks. The median income for the world is…