Viewing profile — qsera

Yea, you got no idea of what you are talking about. Got it the first time.

That is because your response did a weird thing by bringing up "Living naturally". Instead of addressing what I said, you made my response to be about something you can respond to.…

>Outside of vaccines Will you allow an argument against this? I mean, I want to show an example where it is only a problem when someone else is not as convinced as yourself, one wa…

>Things that make you healthier are legitimate input, not things that are "natural". You have no idea of what you are talking about, right?

>I’ll keep being polite and grateful to agents I do that. But I also act rude and call it names at times. I think that is also what makes us human.

You program did not ask for the crash via the language constructs..semantics is defined by the language, rest is the implementation details. That is how it makes sense to me. I don…

Extreme weather changes can be natural. The earth has no contract with humans to keep the weather regulated perfectly. Actually that is the question we are trying to answer when we…

Idiotic article > then you’re a dummy and a schmuck Who cares what names you call. I would be more powerful and comfortable in this world. While you spend your time calling names t…

That is a straight forward task. I am talking about using an LLM to come up with a sequence of complex steps that does not have an intermediate textural representation. So it shoul…

>It's not about the past temperatures though, is it? The "crisis" is about "unprecedented rise in temperature", right? So that implies past temperatures.

No, the stuff it encountered during its millions of years of evolution is not the "monkey wrench". That is its legitimate input. Those are the things that it evolved with. Those it…

> a major refactor Looks like a change of goalposts.

Sorry. I don't want immune system hacks. I don't want to throw a monkey wrench to some system that was created by random tweaks over millions of years and cost millions and million…

>Have you read the IPCC report? Do you have any kind of physics education and experience in real world thermodynamics at scale? No and no, but I find it alarming when even trivial …

Any non-trivial project done at scale for any realistic duration won't work with this procedure. Just consider this for a minute. If re-writes were so trivial, we would be re-writi…

> rare 99% consensus among scientists Any groups of humans can easily reach "consensus" that are wrong.

That is quite unreliable. I would bet that your spec will be out of sync with the program behavior in no time. The only thing that will work is to have non-llm generated tests. But…

>a question for which you would have no response to. I have. Humans can feel.

>With that concept in mind, it's clear how they can be made to "give up". They can, but they need to be trained specifically on that behavior. They can be trained specifically to n…

Well it could miss relevant things to include in the spec.

>just throw the code away and rebuild it What about all the undocumented "adjustments" ("bug fixes" in a professional context) that were made to make it actually useful?

>They're problem-solving and efficiently dealing with obstacles They are problem solving as much as a falling rock is finding its path down a mountain.

> instead just call defeat and say “I’m not sure how to proceed next”. Because that is fundamentally impossible given how they work... The thing does not even know when it succeeds…

Yea, the other guy also want me to stop thinking...

>why would Earth be that incredibly unique? I think the answer to the question is easy if we consider quantum mechanics. It says every possible random event manifests in some unive…