Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — qkqk

qkqk

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jun 21, 2021, 3:20 PM UTC
HN karma
9
Public activity
33 items

About qkqk

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #29026745

    The vertical dividers should just be CSS anyway

  2. comment
    Comment #28963538

    > This is just harrassment [sic] against a right-wing media site Is Tesla a right-wing media site too? Vizio? Or did you just construct a narrative without knowing history? https:/…

  3. comment
    Comment #28962964

    That's about 22.5% of the country, not half.

  4. comment
    Comment #28961587

    > That's why I used the word "sought" Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, which would in effect silence and cancel…

  5. comment
    Comment #28961509

    > making the source code public (which AGPL does not require) That is completely false. If you read the article or the license before commenting you will understand why. https://ww…

  6. comment
    Comment #28961432

    > How could they have 'broke' the rules [sic] By violating the terms of the license. They have 30 days to remedy the violation, or their rights in the software are permanently term…

  7. comment
    Comment #28961343

    If you'd heard about it, you wouldn't need someone else to find cites or links, I'm not that gullible. > Did not create new law Right, it had no effect, just more signalling from T…

  8. comment
    Comment #28961281

    You'd never even heard of the EO before today, so I understand why you're confused. Nothing ever went into effect, it would have run afoul of the First Amendment, and it made deman…

  9. comment
    Comment #28961150

    It made major headlines, I'm surprised you're so far out of the loop you never heard about it. The link to a Google search I provided for you makes it easy to find the EO: https://…

  10. comment
    Comment #28961124

    Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, repealing protections under Section 230, thereby exposing them to lawsuits, wh…

  11. comment
    Comment #28960937

    Oh wow, you really didn't know? https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/ex... https://books.google.com/books?id=B1MzEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA259#v=on... https://trumpwhiteho…

  12. comment
    Comment #28960556

    Trump signed an executive order to allow people to "silence and cancel" Twitter users after Twitter added a fact check to a single Tweet of his. Does that make him part of the Mode…

  13. comment
    Comment #28960336

    It did say the beta was public "Truth Social hasn’t officially launched. But users could access a test version of the platform" > if you run AGPL code on a home server for personal…

  14. comment
    Comment #28921321

    You've made a lot of comments about "blacks" for someone who doesn't "give a flying rat"

  15. comment
    Comment #28921153

    That or the art director thought it communicated the brand effectively. > the literal opposite of diversity Were you worried we'd think it was the figurative opposite if you didn't…

  16. comment
    Comment #28172735

    And the reply in the other direction mentions Hunter Biden. I don't understand why! (We're still pretending we don't know that people are insinuating Snopes has a liberal bias righ…

  17. comment
    Comment #28172710

    Huh, the article where they say "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the Capitol" and instead “peacefully and patriotically” march does't fi…

  18. comment
    Comment #28172314

    That is false, and I linked to a new, different article, not a "retconned" one. They didn't change their stance, they criticize those that do, and reference a medical journal artic…

  19. comment
    Comment #28171714

    > I'm making no claims as to whether or not Snopes omits references Good, they clearly do not omit references, thanks for not challenging that! Snopes has debunked hundreds of libe…

  20. comment
    Comment #28171621

    Right, you can tell by the publication date (it's in the URL), why I say "they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence." What you said is not true, and t…

  21. comment
    Comment #28171498

    > the logical fallacies are hurting my brain Like your "they don't omit references ever " straw man? "This one case" meaning one of the most significant and contested events of the…

  22. comment
    Comment #28171059

    Snopes didn't, they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence. Which presumably you agree with...oops! [1] Back on topic: why didn't they omit those refere…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #28170598

    Remind me of their narrative again? They say that > "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the [US] Capitol." and included the reasoning that …

  25. comment
    Comment #28170505

    Really? So you think Trump was wearing his pants backwards at this rally? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-wear-pants-backwards... Snopes says he wasn't , and shows evidence…