Viewing profile — qkqk
qkqk
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 21, 2021, 3:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 9
- Public activity
- 33 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qkqk
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29026745
The vertical dividers should just be CSS anyway
-
comment
Comment #28963538
> This is just harrassment [sic] against a right-wing media site Is Tesla a right-wing media site too? Vizio? Or did you just construct a narrative without knowing history? https:/…
-
comment
Comment #28962964
That's about 22.5% of the country, not half.
-
comment
Comment #28961587
> That's why I used the word "sought" Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, which would in effect silence and cancel…
-
comment
Comment #28961509
> making the source code public (which AGPL does not require) That is completely false. If you read the article or the license before commenting you will understand why. https://ww…
-
comment
Comment #28961432
> How could they have 'broke' the rules [sic] By violating the terms of the license. They have 30 days to remedy the violation, or their rights in the software are permanently term…
-
comment
Comment #28961343
If you'd heard about it, you wouldn't need someone else to find cites or links, I'm not that gullible. > Did not create new law Right, it had no effect, just more signalling from T…
-
comment
Comment #28961281
You'd never even heard of the EO before today, so I understand why you're confused. Nothing ever went into effect, it would have run afoul of the First Amendment, and it made deman…
-
comment
Comment #28961150
It made major headlines, I'm surprised you're so far out of the loop you never heard about it. The link to a Google search I provided for you makes it easy to find the EO: https://…
-
comment
Comment #28961124
Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, repealing protections under Section 230, thereby exposing them to lawsuits, wh…
-
comment
Comment #28960937
Oh wow, you really didn't know? https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/ex... https://books.google.com/books?id=B1MzEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA259#v=on... https://trumpwhiteho…
-
comment
Comment #28960556
Trump signed an executive order to allow people to "silence and cancel" Twitter users after Twitter added a fact check to a single Tweet of his. Does that make him part of the Mode…
-
comment
Comment #28960336
It did say the beta was public "Truth Social hasn’t officially launched. But users could access a test version of the platform" > if you run AGPL code on a home server for personal…
-
comment
Comment #28921321
You've made a lot of comments about "blacks" for someone who doesn't "give a flying rat"
-
comment
Comment #28921153
That or the art director thought it communicated the brand effectively. > the literal opposite of diversity Were you worried we'd think it was the figurative opposite if you didn't…
-
comment
Comment #28172735
And the reply in the other direction mentions Hunter Biden. I don't understand why! (We're still pretending we don't know that people are insinuating Snopes has a liberal bias righ…
-
comment
Comment #28172710
Huh, the article where they say "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the Capitol" and instead “peacefully and patriotically” march does't fi…
-
comment
Comment #28172314
That is false, and I linked to a new, different article, not a "retconned" one. They didn't change their stance, they criticize those that do, and reference a medical journal artic…
-
comment
Comment #28171714
> I'm making no claims as to whether or not Snopes omits references Good, they clearly do not omit references, thanks for not challenging that! Snopes has debunked hundreds of libe…
-
comment
Comment #28171621
Right, you can tell by the publication date (it's in the URL), why I say "they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence." What you said is not true, and t…
-
comment
Comment #28171498
> the logical fallacies are hurting my brain Like your "they don't omit references ever " straw man? "This one case" meaning one of the most significant and contested events of the…
-
comment
Comment #28171059
Snopes didn't, they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence. Which presumably you agree with...oops! [1] Back on topic: why didn't they omit those refere…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #28170598
Remind me of their narrative again? They say that > "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the [US] Capitol." and included the reasoning that …
-
comment
Comment #28170505
Really? So you think Trump was wearing his pants backwards at this rally? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-wear-pants-backwards... Snopes says he wasn't , and shows evidence…